Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:56:38.326Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

BIOINSPIRED COMPUTATIONAL DESIGN: A CASE STUDY ON A 3D-PRINTED LAMP BASED ON THE PHYSALIS ALKEKENGI

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2021

Serena Graziosi ,
Giulia Wally Scurati ,
Roberta Parmose ,
Alberto Lecchi ,
Monica Bordegoni  and
Francesco Ferrise
Serena Graziosi*
Affiliation:
Politecnico di Milano
Giulia Wally Scurati
Affiliation:
Politecnico di Milano
Roberta Parmose
Affiliation:
Politecnico di Milano
Alberto Lecchi
Affiliation:
Politecnico di Milano
Monica Bordegoni
Affiliation:
Politecnico di Milano
Francesco Ferrise
Affiliation:
Politecnico di Milano
*
Graziosi, Serena, Politecnico di Milano, Department of Mechanical Engineering Italy, [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Nature has always been a source of inspiration for designers and engineers, through the imitation of biological patterns and structures. This emulating and creative process is nowadays supported by technologies and tools as additive manufacturing and computational design. This paper describes the design and prototyping of a lamp inspired by a plant called Physalis Alkekengi, known as Chinese Lantern. We present the development of an algorithm, based on a computational model from literature, to realize the 2D pattern and leaves. They were then 3D printed to create the structure of the lamp and obtain an aesthetical and symbolic shading effect.

Keywords

Computational design methodsDesign for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)Bio-inspired design / biomimetics
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 1: ICED21 , August 2021 , pp. 561 - 570
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Aziz, M. S. and El sherif, A. Y. (2016), ‘Biomimicry as an approach for bio-inspired structure with the aid of computation’, Alexandria Engineering Journal 55(1), 707–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2015.10.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babaee, S., Pajovic, S., Rafsanjani, A., Shi, Y., Bertoldi, K. and Traverso, G. (2020), ‘Bioinspired kirigami metasurfaces as assistive shoe grips’, Nature Biomedical Engineering 4(8), 778–786. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-020-0564-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ball, P. (2009a), Branches: Nature's patterns: a tapestry in three parts, OUP Oxford.Google Scholar
Ball, P. (2009b), Shapes: nature's patterns: a tapestry in three parts, OUP Oxford.Google Scholar
Ball, P. (2011), Flow: Nature's patterns: A tapestry in three parts, Vol. 2, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Benyus, J. M. (1997), ‘Biomimicry: Innovation inspired by nature’.Google Scholar
Blok, V. and Gremmen, C. (2016), ‘Ecological innovation: Biomimicry as a new way of thinking and acting ecologically’, Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 29, 203–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-015-9596-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
du Plessis, A. and Broeckhoven, C. (2019), ‘Looking deep into nature: A review of micro-computed tomography in biomimicry’, Acta Biomaterialia 85, 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2018.12.014CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
du Plessis, A., Broeckhoven, C., Yadroitsava, I., Yadroitsev, I., Hands, C. H., Kunju, R. and Bhate, D. (2019), ‘Beautiful and functional: A review of biomimetic design in additive manufacturing’, Additive Manufacturing 27, 408–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.03.033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Zeiny, R. M. A. (2012), ‘Biomimicry as a problem solving methodology in interior architecture’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 50, 502–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandes, M. C., Aizenberg, J., Weaver, J. C. and Bertoldi, K. (2020), ‘Mechanically robust lattices inspired by deep-sea glass sponges’, Nature Materials. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-020-0798-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, S. F., Thielen, M., Loprang, R. R., Seidel, R., Fleck, C., Speck, T. and Bührig-Polaczek, A. (2010), ‘Pummelos as concept generators for biomimetically inspired low weight structures with excellent damping properties’, Advanced Engineering Materials 12(12), B658–B663. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.201080065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gokmen, S. (2013), ‘A Morphogenetic approach for performative building envelope systems using leaf venetian patterns’, in Stouffs, Rudi and Sariyildiz, Sevil (eds.), Computation and Performance - Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Education and Research in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe (eCAADe) - Volume 1, Faculty of Architecture, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands, 18-20 September 2013, pp. 497–506.Google Scholar
Kennedy, E. B. and Marting, T. A. (2016), ‘Biomimicry: Streamlining the front end of innovation for environmentally sustainable products’, Research-Technology Management 59(4), 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2016.1185342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, J., Song, C. and He, C. (2019), ’Chinese lantern in physalis is an advantageous morphological novelty and improves plant fitness’, Scientific Reports 9(1), 596. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-36436-7Google Scholar
Nervous System (2011), ‘Hyphae lamps’. Available at: https://n-e-r-v-o-u-s.com/blog/?p=1701 (accessed 24 March 2021).Google Scholar
Oxman, N. (2010), ‘Structuring materiality: Design fabrication of heterogeneous materials’, Architectural Design 80(4), 78–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.1110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prusinkiewicz, P. and Hanan, J. (1989), Lindenmayer Systems, Fractals, and Plants, Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-1428-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prusinkiewicz, P. and Lindenmayer, A. (2012), The algorithmic beauty of plants, Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
Prusinkiewicz, P. and Rolland-Lagan, A.-G. (2006), ‘Modeling plant morphogenesis’, Current Opinion in Plant Biology 9(1), 83–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2005.11.015CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ren, J., Wang, Y., Yao, Y., Wang, Y., Fei, X., Qi, P., Lin, S., Kaplan, D. L., Buehler, M. J. and Ling, S. (2019), ‘Biological material interfaces as inspiration for mechanical and optical material designs’, Chemical Reviews 119(24), 12279–12336. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00416CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Runions, A., Fuhrer, M., Lane, B., Federl, P., Rolland-Lagan, A.-G. and Prusinkiewicz, P. (2005), Modeling and visualization of leaf venation patterns, in ‘ACM SIGGRAPH 2005 Papers’, SIGGRAPH ’05, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, pp. 702–711. https://doi.org/10.1145/1186822.1073251Google Scholar
Salcedo, M. K., Hoffmann, J., Donoughe, S. and Mahadevan, L. (2019), ‘Computational analysis of size, shape and structure of insect wings’, Biology Open 8(10). https://bio.biologists.org/content/8/10/bio040774 10.1242/bio.040774CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schaffner, M., Faber, J. A., Pianegonda, L., Rühs, P. A., Coulter, F. and Studart, A. R. (2018), ‘3d printing of robotic soft actuators with programmable bioinspired architectures’, Nature Communications 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03216-wCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sihite, E., Kelly, P. and Ramezani, A. (2020), ‘Computational structure design of a bio-inspired armwing mechanism’, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 5(4), 5929–5936. https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2020.3010217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, L., Kopnina, H., Mulder, K. and De Vries, M. (2020), ‘Biomimicry design thinking education: a base-line exercise in preconceptions of biological analogies’, International Journal of Technology and Design Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09574-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tavsan, F. and Sonmez, E. (2015), ‘Biomimicry in furniture design’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2285–2292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volstad, N. L. and Boks, C. (2012), ‘On the use of biomimicry as a useful tool for the industrial designer’, Sustainable Development 20(3), 189–199. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, D., Chen, D. and Chen, Z. (2020), ‘Recent progress in 3d printing of bioinspired structures’, Frontiers in Materials 7, 286. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2020.00286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weerasinghe, D., Perera, S. and Dissanayake, D. (2019), ‘Application of biomimicry for sustainable functionalization of textiles: review of current status and prospectus’, Textile Research Journal 89(19-20), 4282–4294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040517518821911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Y., Song, X., Li, X., Chen, Z., Zhou, C., Zhou, Q. and Chen, Y. (2018), ‘Recent progress in biomimetic additive manufacturing technology: From materials to functional structures’, Advanced Materials 30(36), 1706539. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201706539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, Y. (2010), ‘Auxin biosynthesis and its role in plant development’, Annual Review of Plant Biology 61(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112308CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed