Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:12:32.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

APPLICATION OF DOMAIN INTEGRATED DESIGN METHODOLOGY FOR BIO-INSPIRED DESIGN- A CASE STUDY OF SUTURE PIN DESIGN

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2021

Pavan Tejaswi Velivela
Affiliation:
McGill University
Nikita Letov
Affiliation:
McGill University
Yuan Liu
Affiliation:
McGill University
Yaoyao Fiona Zhao*
Affiliation:
McGill University
*
Zhao, Yaoyao Fiona, McGill University, mechanical engineering, Canada, [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper investigates the design and development of bio-inspired suture pins that would reduce the insertion force and thereby reducing the pain in the patients. Inspired by kingfisher's beak and porcupine quills, the conceptual design of the suture pin is developed by using a unique ideation methodology that is proposed in this research. The methodology is named as Domain Integrated Design, which involves in classifying bio-inspired structures into various domains. There is little work done on such bio-inspired multifunctional aspect. In this research we have categorized the vast biological functionalities into domains namely, cellular structures, shapes, cross-sections, and surfaces. Multi-functional bio-inspired structures are designed by combining different domains. In this research, the hypothesis is verified by simulating the total deformation of tissue and the needle at the moment of puncture. The results show that the bio-inspired suture pin has a low deformation on the tissue at higher velocities at the puncture point and low deformation in its own structure when an axial force (reaction force) is applied to its tip. This makes the design stiff and thus require less force of insertion.

Type
Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Bao, X., Li, W., Lu, M. & Zhou, Z. 2016. Experiment study on puncture force between MIS suture needle and soft tissue. Biosurface and Biotribology, 2, 4958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bsbt.2016.05.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chebolu, A. & Mallimoggala, A. 2014. Modelling of cutting force and deflection of medical needles with different tip geometries. Procedia Materials Science, 5, 20232031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chopra, K., Calva, D., Sosin, M., Tadisina, K. K., Banda, A., De la Cruz, C., Chaudhry, M. R., Legesse, T., Drachenberg, C. B. & Manson, P. N. 2015. A comprehensive examination of topographic thickness of skin in the human face. Aesthetic surgery journal, 35, 10071013. 'https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjv079CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dąbrowska, A., Rotaru, G. M., Derler, S., Spano, F., Camenzind, M., Annaheim, S., Stämpfli, R., Schmid, M. & Rossi, R. 2016. Materials used to simulate physical properties of human skin. Skin Research and Technology, 22, 314. https://doi.org/10.1111/srt.12235CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dedong, G., Yong, L. & Bin, Y. 2013. Analysis of dynamic tissue deformation during needle insertion into soft tissue. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 46, 684691. https://doi.org/10.3182/20130410-3-cn-2034.00072Google Scholar
Divya, Z., Kaushik, K. & J 2019. 4 - Metallic biomaterials—A review. Woodhead Publishing Series in Biomaterials, 8399. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102174-3.00004-8Google Scholar
Edx, R. A.-. 2020. Lightweight design. edx-MOOC.Google Scholar
Ethicon. Proximate Fixed-Head Skin Staplers [Online]. Available: https://www.ethicon.com/na/epc/search/platform/surgical%20stapling?lang=en-default [Accessed 7th July 2020].Google Scholar
Fayemi, P.-E., Maranzana, N., Aoussat, A. & Bersano, G. 2015. Assessment of the biomimetic toolset—Design Spiral methodology analysis. ICoRD'15–Research into Design Across Boundaries Volume 2. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2229-3_3Google Scholar
Griesser, H. J. 2016. Thin film coatings for biomaterials and biomedical applications. http://doi.org/10.1016/b978-1-78242-453-6.00008-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haubursin, C. 2017. The world is poorly designed. But copying nature helps.Google Scholar
Karp, J. M. 2014. Porcupine-Inspired Needles [Online]. Karp Lab. Available: https://www.karplab.net/portfolio-item/porcupine-inspired-needles [Accessed July 2nd 2020].Google Scholar
Lenau, T. A., Metze, A.-L. & Hesselberg, T. Paradigms for biologically inspired design. Bioinspiration, Biomimetics, and Bioreplication VIII, 2018. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 1059302. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2296560Google Scholar
Li, D.-R., Yeh, J.-K., Putra, K. & Shih, A. 2017. Optical measurement of tissue deformation in needle insertion. Procedia CIRP, 65, 175179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.04.051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, Y., Yuan, L., Li, J. & Wang, J. 2015. Boundary layer drag reduction research hypotheses derived from bio-inspired surface and recent advanced applications. Micron, 79, 5973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micron.2015.07.006CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mckeag, T. 2012. Auspecious Designs Zygote Quarterly Summer 2012 [Online]. Available: https://issuu.com/eggermont/docs/zq_issue_02r_final.Google Scholar
Sabry, Moheb, & Amr, A., Y. 2016. Biomimicry as an approach for bio-inspired structure with the aid of computation. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 55, 707714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2015.10.015Google Scholar
Nagel, J. K., Schmidt, L. & Born, W. 2018. Establishing analogy categories for bio-inspired design. Designs, 2, 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/designs2040047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poologasundarampillai, G. & Nommeots-Nomm, A. 2017. Materials for 3D printing in medicine: Metals, polymers, ceramics, hydrogels. 3D Printing in Medicine. Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-08-100717-4.00002-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
San Ha, N. & Lu, G. 2020. A review of recent research on bio-inspired structures and materials for energy absorption applications. Composites Part B: Engineering, 181, 107496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107496Google Scholar
Sangeetha, K., Kumari, A. J., Venkatesan, J., Sukumaran, A., Aisverya, S. & Sudha, P. 2018. Degradable metallic biomaterials for cardiovascular applications. Fundamental Biomaterials: Metals. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-102205-4.00013-1Google Scholar
Svendsen, N. & Lenau, T. A. How does biologically inspired design cope with multi-functionality? Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design, 2019. Cambridge University Press, 349358. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.38Google Scholar
Zhang, M., Feng, S., Wang, L. & Zheng, Y. 2016. Lotus effect in wetting and self-cleaning. Biotribology, 5, 3143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotri.2015.08.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar