Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:05:36.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ANALYSIS OF THE APPLICATION OF SYNAESTHESIA CONCEPT IN MODERN PRODUCT DESIGN

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2023

Yang RuiKun ,
Shahriman Zainal Abidin  and
Verly Veto Vermol
Yang RuiKun*
Affiliation:
UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA (UiTM); School of Arts, Lanzhou Technology and Business College
Shahriman Zainal Abidin
Affiliation:
UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA (UiTM);
Verly Veto Vermol
Affiliation:
UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA (UiTM);
*
RuiKun, Yang, UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA (UiTM), China, People's Republic of [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Objective To analyze and discuss the application of synaesthesia theory in modern product design and emphasize the important position and necessity of synaesthesia in modern product design. Methods Based on the concept of synesthesia, the value, significance and design principles of synesthesia in modern product design were further analyzed and summarized through the study of concrete examples of shape, color, material and using methods. Conclusion When the concept of synesthesia is applied to product design, it can enhance the expressive force of products, realize users' synesthetic perception, mobilize users' senses to give psychological suggestions, meet users' various psychological needs, and bring users a richer physical and mental experience.

Keywords

CommunicationEmotional designMultisensory product experience
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 3: ICED23 , July 2023 , pp. 565 - 572
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Altenhofen, JA, Oyama, KF, Jacques, DR (2015) A methodology to determine the influence of requirements change to support system design. IIE Annu Conf Expo 2015 2181–2190Google Scholar
Beesemyer, JC, Ross, AM, Rhodes, DH (2012) An empirical investigation of system changes to frame links between design decisions and ilities. Procedia Comput Sci 8:31–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2012.01.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brahma, A, Wynn, DC, Isaksson, O (2022) Use of Margin to Absorb Variation in Design Specifications: An Analysis Using the Margin Value Method. Proc Des Soc 2:323–332. https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2022.34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chhabra, JK, Parashar, A (2014) Prediction of changeability for object oriented classes and packages by mining change history. Can Conf Electr Comput Eng 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/CCECE.2014.6901146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colombo, EF, Cascini, G, De Weck, OL (2016) Classification of Change-Related Ilities Based on a Literature Review of Engineering Changes. J Integr Des Process Sci 20:1–21. https://doi.org/10.3233/jid-2016-0019Google Scholar
Eckert, C, Isaksson, O, Earl, C (2019) Design margins: a hidden issue in industry. Des Sci 5:1–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2019.7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fricke, E, Gebhard, B, Negele, H, Igenbergs, E (2000) Coping with Changes: Causes, Findings and Strategies. Syst Eng 3:169–179. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6858(2000)3:4<169::AID-SYS1>3.0.CO;2-W3.0.CO;2-W>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaspar, HM, Erikstad, SO, Ross, AM (2012) Handling temporal complexity in the design of non-transport ships using Epoch-Era Analysis. Trans. R. Inst. Nav. Archit. Part A Int. J. Marit. Eng.Google Scholar
Giffin, M, De Weck, OL, Bounova, G, Keller, R, Eckert, CM, Clarkson, PJ (2009) Change Propagation Analysis in Complex Technical Systems. J Mech Des 131:0810011–08100114. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3149847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, EJ, Evans, J (1959) Basic Design Concepts. J Am Soc Nav Eng 71:671–678. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-3584.1959.tb01836.xGoogle Scholar
Jarratt, TAW, Eckert, CM, Caldwell, NHM, Clarkson, PJ (2011) Engineering change: An overview and perspective on the literature. Res Eng Des 22:103–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-010-0097-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mcmahon, CA (1994) Observations on Modes of Incremental Change in Design Design. J Eng Des 5. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544829408907883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McManus, H, Richards, MG, Ross, AM, Hastings, DE (2007) A Framework for Incorporating “ilities” in Tradespace Studies. Am Inst Aeronaut Astronaut 1–14. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2007-6100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mekdeci, B (2013) Managing the impact of change through survivability and pliability to achieve variable systems of systemsGoogle Scholar
Mekdeci, B, Ross, AM, Rhodes, DH, Hastings, DE (2015) Pliability and Viable Systems: Maintaining Value under Changing Conditions. IEEE Syst J 9:1173–1184. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSYST.2014.2314316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misra, SC (2015) Design principles of ships and marine structuresCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rehn, CF, Garcia Agis, JJ, Erikstad, SO, de Neufville, R (2018a) Versatility vs. retrofittability tradeoff in design of non-transport vessels. Ocean Eng.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rehn, CF, Pettersen, SS, Erikstad, SO, Asbjørnslett, BE (2018b) Investigating tradeoffs between performance, cost and flexibility for reconfigurable offshore ships. Ocean Eng.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rehn, CF, Pettersen, SS, Garcia, JJ, Brett, PO, Erikstad, SO, Asbjørnslett, BE, Ross, AM, Rhodes, DH (2019) Quantification of changeability level for engineering systems. Syst Eng 22:80–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.21472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, AM, Rhodes, DH (2008) Using attribute classes to uncover latent value during conceptual systems design. 2008 IEEE Int Syst Conf Proceedings, SysCon 2008 7–14. https://doi.org/10.1109/SYSTEMS.2008.4518981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahoo, PK (2021) Principles of Marine Vessel Design: Concepts and Design Fundamentals of Sea Going Vessels. World Scientific PublishingCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulz, AP, Fricke, E (1999) Incorporating Flexibility, Agility, Robustness, and Adaptability Within the Design of Integrated Systems - Key to Success? Design 1/17 pp. v:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/DASC.1999.863677Google Scholar
Sullivan, B, Rossi, M, Ramundo, L, Terzi, S (2019) Characteristics for the implementation of changeability in complex systems. In: XXIII Summer School Francesco Turco 2019. Brescia, Italy, pp 1–7Google Scholar
Sullivan, BP, Ansaloni, GMM, Bionda, A, Rossi, M (2022) A life cycle perspective to sustainable hydrogen powered maritime systems - functional and technical requirements. Int J Prod Lifecycle Manag 14:282–301. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijplm.2022.125822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, BP, Rossi, M, Terzi, S (2018) A Review of Changeability in Complex Engineering Systems. In: IFAC-PapersOnLine. Elsevier B.V., pp 1567–1572Google Scholar
Uckun, S, Mackey, R, Do, M, Zhou, R, Huang, E, Shah, JJ (2014) Measures of product design adaptability for changing requirements. Artif Intell Eng Des Anal Manuf AIEDAM 28:353–368. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060414000523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Universtiy A (2016) Shipyard engineering Lecture 2-1: Design processes and systemsGoogle Scholar
Valerdi, R, Sullivan, BP (2020) Chapter 3 - Engineering systems integration, testing and validation. In: Handbook of Engineering Systems Design. Springer, p 27Google Scholar
Vossen, C, Kleppe, R, Randi, S (2013) Ship Design and System Integration. In: DMK 2013Google Scholar