Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T04:40:40.226Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ADOPTION OF MODULAR DESIGN BY MAKERS AND PROSUMERS. A SURVEY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2021

Laura Asión-Suñer  and
Ignacio López-Forniés
Laura Asión-Suñer*
Affiliation:
Universidad de Zaragoza
Ignacio López-Forniés
Affiliation:
Universidad de Zaragoza
*
Asión-Suñer, Laura, Universidad de Zaragoza, Department of Design and Manufacturing Engineering, Spain, [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The growing tendency for end users to get involved in the design and manufacturing phase of their own products has led to the proliferation of makers and prosumers. The tools available for this have been adapted to be used by non-specialized users who seek to meet their own needs and wants. Modular design offers a series of advantages directly related to the needs of current users, but which has hardly been used to benefit them. Instead, its development has geared towards aspects that are hidden to the consumer, such as flexible production.

This work presents a survey, part of a wider research, whose objective is to develop a methodological model for the prosumer to benefit from modular design. The survey was open for several months and was only aimed at makers, prosumers and designers. A dissemination plan was drawn up where the current communication channels of these users were taken into account. The results show what the current prosumer is like, what their needs are and how they relate to modular design. Finally, the conclusions provide information on how to develop a model proposal to ensure its correct usability and acceptance.

Keywords

Modular designProsumerDesign methodsNew product developmentUser centred design
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 1: ICED21 , August 2021 , pp. 355 - 364
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

AlGeddawy, T. and ElMaraghy, H. (2013), “Reactive design methodology for product family platforms, modularity and parts integration”, CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, CIRP, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 34–43. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2012.08.001Google Scholar
Asión-Suñer, L. and López-Forniés, I. (2019), “Modular Design: Product Design Opportunities and a Case Analysis”, Advances on Mechanics, Design Engineering and Manufacturing II, Springer, pp. 596–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12346-8_58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asión-Suñer, L. and López-Forniés, I. (2020), “Prosumer and Product Design Through Digital Tools”, Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, pp. 23–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41200-5_3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairphone. (2020), “Fairphone”, available at: https://www.fairphone.com/es/ (accessed 12 April 2020).Google Scholar
Favi, C. and Germani, M. (2012), “A method to optimize assemblability of industrial product in early design phase: From product architecture to assembly sequence”, International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing, Vol. 6 No. 3, pp. 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-012-0147-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
den Hollander, M.C., Bakker, C.A. and Hultink, E.J. (2017), “Product Design in a Circular Economy: Development of a Typology of Key Concepts and Terms”, Journal of Industrial Ecology, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 517–525. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maker Faire Bilbao. (2019), “Maker Faire Bilbao”, available at: https://bilbao.makerfaire.com/Google Scholar
Papavlasopoulou, S., Giannakos, M.N. and Jaccheri, L. (2017), “Empirical studies on the Maker Movement, a promising approach to learning: A literature review”, Entertainment Computing, Elsevier B.V., Vol. 18, pp. 57–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2016.09.002Google Scholar
Souza, T. and Sato, L. (2019), “Educational Robotics Teaching with Arduino and 3D Print Based on Stem Projects”, 2019 Latin American Robotics Symposium (LARS), 2019 Brazilian Symposium on Robotics (SBR) and 2019 Workshop on Robotics in Education (WRE), IEEE, pp. 407–410. https://doi.org/10.1109/LARS-SBR-WRE48964.2019.00078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swidget. (2020), “Swidget”, available at: https://www.swidget.com/ (accessed 12 April 2020).Google Scholar
Toffler, A. (1980), The Third Wave, The Ultimate Business Library, Wiley, Wiley.Google Scholar
You, Z.-H. and Smith, S. (2016), “A multi-objective modular design method for creating highly distinct independent modules”, Research in Engineering Design, Springer, Vol. 27 No. 2, pp. 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-016-0213-8Google Scholar
Zheng, P., Xu, X., Yu, S. and Liu, C. (2017), “Personalized product configuration framework in an adaptable open architecture product platform”, Journal of Manufacturing Systems, The Society of Manufacturing Engineers, Vol. 43, pp. 422–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2017.03.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar