Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:57:00.315Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING – ENABLING DIGITAL ARTISANS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2021

Priyabrata Rautray  and
Boris Eisenbart
Priyabrata Rautray*
Affiliation:
IIT Hyderabad
Boris Eisenbart
Affiliation:
Swinburne University of Technology
*
Rautray, Priyabrata, IIT Hyderabad, Design, India, [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

New technologies have always been disruptive for established systems and processes. Additive Manufacturing (AM) is proving to be one such process which has the potential to disrupt handicraft and its manufacturing processes. AM is customisable, adopt multiple materials and is not restricted by the manufacturing process. Our research discusses this global phenomenon with case studies to highlights the growth of a new kind of professionals known as ‘Digital Artisans’. These artisans will assimilate the latest technologies with the cultural practices of the societies to create a new genre of products. The evolution of such artisans will be majorly led by people who have an equal inclination towards art and science and can act as the bridge between the handicrafts and technology. The development of such artisans will be supported by academics that will serve as a cradle and expose them to AM, design and handicraft. Its will also help in paving the growth of contemporary artisans who will utilise the strength of algorithms, artificial intelligence, CAD software and traditional aesthetics to create handicrafts of the future.

Keywords

Additive Manufacturing3D printingCase studyComputer Aided Design (CAD)Industry 4.0
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 1: ICED21 , August 2021 , pp. 323 - 332
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Abramovici, M., Göbel, J.C. and Neges, M. (2015) ‘Smart Engineering as Enabler for the 4th Industrial Revolution’ in Fathi, M., ed., Integrated Systems: Innovations and Applications, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 163–170.Google Scholar
Bull, G., Chiu, J., Berry, R., Lipson, H. and Xie, C. (2014) ‘Advancing children's engineering through desktop manufacturing’ in Handbook of research on educational communications and technology Springer, 675–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bushwinkel, B. (2020) A 3D-printed grotto designed by algorithms | Design Indaba, available: https://www.designindaba.com/articles/creative-work/3d-printed-grotto-designed-algorithms [accessedGoogle Scholar
Çakmakçıoğlu, B.A. (2017) ‘Effect of Digital Age on the Transmission of Cultural Values in Product Design’, The Design Journal, 20(sup1), S3824–S3836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castro E Costa, E., Duarte, J.P. and Bártolo, P. (2017) ‘A review of additive manufacturing for ceramic production’, Rapid Prototyping Journal, 23(5), 954–963, available: http://doi.org/10.1108/rpj-09-2015-0128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diegel, O., Singamneni, S., Reay, S. and Withell, A. (2010) ‘Tools for sustainable product design: additive manufacturing’.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillenburger, B. and Hansmeyer, M. (2013) ‘The Resolution of Architecture in the Digital Age’ in Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 347–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillenburger, B. and Hansmeyer, M. (2019) ‘Digital Grotesque II’ in Robotic Building: Architecture in the Age of Automation DETAIL, 48–50.Google Scholar
Fernandes, S.C. and Simoes, R. (2016) ‘Collaborative use of different learning styles through 3D printing’, in 2016 2nd International Conference of the Portuguese Society for Engineering Education (CISPEE), IEEE, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, S. and Minshall, T. (2019) ‘Invited review article: Where and how 3D printing is used in teaching and education’, Additive Manufacturing, 25, 131–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gulati, V. and Mathur, S. (2017) ‘Digital manufacturing of Indian traditional handicrafts’, International Journal of Computer Applications, 164(11), 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gürsoy, B. (2018) ‘From Control to Uncertainty in 3D Printing with Clay’.Google Scholar
Hague, R., Campbell, I. and Dickens, P. (2003) ‘Implications on design of rapid manufacturing’, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 217(1), 25–30, available: http://doi.org/10.1243/095440603762554587.Google Scholar
Hermann, M., Pentek, T. and Otto, B. (2016) ‘Design Principles for Industrie 4.0 Scenarios’, in 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), 5–8 Jan. 2016, 3928-3937, available: http://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2016.488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herpt, O.V. (2012) Functional 3D printed Ceramics, available: http://oliviervanherpt.com/functional-3d-printed-ceramics/ [accessedGoogle Scholar
Hsu, M.-C., Purzer, S. and Cardella, M.E. (2011) ‘Elementary teachers' views about teaching design, engineering, and technology’, Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 1(2), 5.Google Scholar
Hu, S.J. (2013) ‘Evolving Paradigms of Manufacturing: From Mass Production to Mass Customization and Personalization’, Procedia CIRP, 7, 3–8, available: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2013.05.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jasveer, S. and Jianbin, X. (2018) ‘Comparison of different types of 3D printing technologies’, International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications (IJSRP), 8(4), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kietzmann, J., Pitt, L. and Berthon, P. (2015) ‘Disruptions, decisions, and destinations: Enter the age of 3-D printing and additive manufacturing’, Business Horizons, 58(2), 209–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kostoff, R.N., Boylan, R. and Simons, G.R. (2004) ‘Disruptive technology roadmaps’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 71(1-2), 141–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, L.J., Pandey, P.M. and Wimpenny, D.I. (2019) 3D printing and additive manufacturing technologies, Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, B. (2006) How designers think, Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Y. (2017) ‘Study on the application of “3D printing” in interior decoration’ in Machinery, Materials Science and Engineering Applications CRC Press, 543–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oxman, N. (2011) ‘Variable property rapid prototyping: inspired by nature, where form is characterized by heterogeneous compositions, the paper presents a novel approach to layered manufacturing entitled variable property rapid prototyping’, Virtual and physical prototyping, 6(1), 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Press, M. and Cooper, R. (2017) The design experience: the role of design and designers in the twenty-first century, Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skilton, M. and Hovsepian, F. (2017) The 4th industrial revolution: Responding to the impact of artificial intelligence on business, Springer.Google Scholar
Soundhariya, S. (2016) Make in India †"Scheme For Transforming India.Google Scholar
Stangl, A., Kim, J. and Yeh, T. (2014) ‘3D printed tactile picture books for children with visual impairments: a design probe’, in Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Interaction design and children, 321–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, W.-y. (2016) ‘The Integration of the 3D Printing Technology and Traditional Chinese Handicrafts’, in Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management 2015, Springer, 293–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar