Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T05:08:47.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE USER-DRIVEN MINIMUM FEASIBLE PRODUCT – TOWARDS A NOVEL APPROACH ON USER INTEGRATION

Part of: Human Behaviour and Design

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2020

S. J. Nicklas ,
A. Atzberger ,
J. C. Briede-Westermeyer  and
K. Paetzold
S. J. Nicklas*
Affiliation:
Bundeswehr University Munich, Germany
A. Atzberger
Affiliation:
Bundeswehr University Munich, Germany
J. C. Briede-Westermeyer
Affiliation:
Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María, Chile
K. Paetzold
Affiliation:
Bundeswehr University Munich, Germany
*
*[email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

User integration is a key aspect of new product development. When applying corresponding methods, however, there is a communication gap that needs to be overcome by the designer. Prototyping is a means to bridge this disjunction, yet brings its own set of hermeneutic limitations. Taking a closer look at the processual information exchange, we propose the concept of the user-driven minimum feasible product (UD-MFP). It describes the artefact generated by the users themselves in their specific context, which contains the essence of the problem's solution as a possible source of validation.

Keywords

prototypingdesign theorydesign researchuser integrationmedia richness theory
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference , Volume 1 , May 2020 , pp. 1495 - 1504
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Bhatti, Y.A. and Ventresca, M. (2013), “How Can ‘Frugal Innovation’ Be Conceptualized?”, SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2203552Google Scholar
Boer, L. (2011), “Participatory Provocation?”, Proceedings of the Participatory Innovation Conference 2011, Søndvnerborg , Denmark, pp. 18–23.Google Scholar
Boer, L. and Donovan, J. (2012), “Provotypes for participatory innovation”, DIS ‘12: Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference, ACM Press, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK, pp. 388–397. https://doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2318014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, T. (2009), Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation, Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Buxton, B. (2007), Sketching User Experiences: Getting the Design Right and the Right Design, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.Google Scholar
Camburn, B. et al. (2017), “Design prototyping methods: state of the art in strategies, techniques, and guidelines”, Design Science, Vol. 3, p. e13. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2017.10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cappelli, P. et al. (2010), “Leadership Lessons from India”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 88 No. 3, pp. 90–97.Google ScholarPubMed
Daft, R.L. and Lengel, R.H. (1983), Information Richness. A New Approach to Managerial Behavior and Organization Design, Defense Technical Information Center, Fort Belvoir, VA. https://doi.org/10.21236/ADA128980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duc, A.N. and Abrahamsson, P. (2016), “Minimum Viable Product or Multiple Facet Product? The Role of MVP in Software Startups”, In: Sharp, H. and Hall, T. (Eds.), Agile Processes, in Software Engineering, and Extreme Programming, Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 118–130.10.1007/978-3-319-33515-5_10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duraiswamy, V. et al. (2018), “Development of a Methodology for Robust Evaluation of Perceived Quality of Vehicle Body Panel Gaps”, presented at the 15th International Design Conference, DESIGN, pp. 237–248. https://doi.org/10.21278/idc.2018.0432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, C., Maier, A. and McMahon, M. (2005), “Communication in design”, In: Clarkson, J. and Eckert, C. (Eds.), Design Process Improvement, Springer-Verlag, London, pp. 232–261.10.1007/978-1-84628-061-0_10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elverum, C.W., Welo, T. and Tronvoll, S. (2016), “Prototyping in New Product Development: Strategy Considerations”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 50, pp. 117–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.05.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaver, B., Dunne, T. and Pacenti, E. (1999), “Design: Cultural probes”, Interactions, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/291224.291235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaver, W.W. et al. (2004), “Cultural probes and the value of uncertainty”, Interactions, Vol. 11 No. 5, pp. 53. https://doi.org/10.1145/1015530.1015555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gulati, R. (2010), “Management Lessons From the Edge”, Academy of Management Perspectives, Vol. 24 No. 2, pp. 25–27.Google Scholar
Hansen, F. (1974), Konstruktionswissenschaft: Grundlagen Und Methoden, 1st ed., VEB Verlag Technik, Berlin.Google Scholar
Heck, J. et al. (2016), “Iteration-based Performance Measurement in the Fuzzy Front End of PDPs”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 50, pp. 14–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.04.183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houde, S. and Hill, C. (1997), “What do Prototypes Prototype?”, Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, 2nd ed., Elsevier, pp. 367–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-81862-1.X5065-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jahnke, M. (2012), “Revisiting Design as a Hermeneutic Practice: An Investigation of Paul Ricoeur's Critical Hermeneutics”, Design Issues, Vol. 28 No. 2, pp. 30–40. https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lauff, C., Kotys-Schwartz, D. and Rentschler, M. (2018), “What is a Prototype? What are the Roles of Prototypes in Companies?”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 140, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4039340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lim, Y.-K., Stolterman, E. and Tenenberg, J. (2008), “The anatomy of prototypes: Prototypes as filters, prototypes as manifestations of design ideas”, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1145/1375761.1375762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liou, F.W. (2007), Rapid Prototyping and Engineering Applications: A Toolbox for Prototype Development, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, FL.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Møller, L. and Tollestrup, C. (2013), Creating Shared Understanding in Product Development Teams, Springer London, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4180-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moogk, D.R. (2012), “Minimum Viable Product and the Importance of Experimentation in Technology Startups”, Technology Innovation Management Review, pp. 23–26. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ojeda, L. and Pino, A. (2019), “Valparaíso y su comercio callejero: ¿Espacialidad esporádica y/o espacialidad saturada?”, AUS, No. 25, pp. 11–19. https://doi.org/10.4206/aus.2019.n25-03CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, K. et al. (2000), “The ‘Validation Square’ - Validating Design Methods & Research”, presented at the ASME Design Theory and Methodology Conference, Baltimore, Maryland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Punkka, T. (2012), “Agile Hardware and Co-Design”, presented at the Embedded Systems Conference 2012, ESC-3008, Boston.Google Scholar
Radjou, N. et al. (2012), Jugaad Innovation: Think Frugal, Be Flexible, Generate Breakthrough Growth, Wiley.Google Scholar
Ricœur, P. (1972), “Der Text als Modell: hermeneutisches Verstehen”, In: Bühl, W.L. (Ed.), Verstehende Soziologie: Grundzüge und Entwicklungstendenzen. Elf Aufsätze, Nymphenburger Verlagshandlung, München, pp. 252–283.Google Scholar
Ries, E. (2011), The Lean Startup: How Today's Entrepreneurs Use Continuous Innovation to Create Radically Successful Businesses, Crown/Archetype.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, R. and Fode, K.L. (1963), “The effect of experimenter bias on the performance of the albino rat”, Behavioral Science, Vol. 8 No. 3, pp. 183–189. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830080302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, E.B.-N. and Stappers, P.J. (2008), “Co-creation and the new landscapes of design”, CoDesign, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, E.B.-N. and Stappers, P.J. (2014), “Probes, toolkits and prototypes: three approaches to making in codesigning”, CoDesign, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2014.888183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savoia, A. (2011), Pretotype It, Second Pretotype Edition.Google Scholar
Schmidt, T.S. (2019), Towards a Method for Agile Development in Mechatronics: A Lead User-Based Analysis on How to Cope with the Constraints of Physicality, Shaker, Düren.Google Scholar
Schmidt, T.S. et al. (2017), “Media richness theory in agile development choosing appropriate kinds of prototypes to obtain reliable feedback”, presented at the 2017 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC), IEEE, Funchal, pp. 521–530. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2017.8279930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stappers, J.P. (2013), “Prototypes as a Central Vein for Knowledge Development”, in Valentine, L. (Ed.), Prototype: Design and Craft in the 21st Century, Bloomsbury Publishing Plc, pp. 85–98. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350036031Google Scholar
Stevanović, M., Marjanović, D. and Storga, M. (2016), “Managing the process of preparation for product development : Ideas assessment and evaluation”, presented at the 14th International Design Conference, DESIGN 2016, Cavtat, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 16-19 May 2016, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, pp. 1155–1164.Google Scholar
Ulrich, K.T. and Eppinger, S.D. (2012), Product Design and Development, McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York.Google Scholar
Visser, F.S. et al. (2005), “Contextmapping: experiences from practice”, CoDesign, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 119–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880500135987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zink, L. et al. (2017), “The use of prototypes within agile product development explorative case study of a Makeathon”, presented at the 2017 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC), IEEE, Funchal, pp. 68–77. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2017.8279871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar