Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T21:17:03.893Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

REVIEWING COMPLEXITY COSTS – WHAT PRACTICE NEEDS AND WHAT RESEARCH CONTRIBUTES

Part of: Design Organisation and Management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2020

O. Meßerschmidt ,
T. Gumpinger ,
M. Meyer  and
K. G. Mertens
O. Meßerschmidt*
Affiliation:
Hamburg University of Technology, Germany Odego GmbH, Germany
T. Gumpinger
Affiliation:
Odego GmbH, Germany
M. Meyer
Affiliation:
Hamburg University of Technology, Germany
K. G. Mertens
Affiliation:
Hamburg University of Technology, Germany
*
*[email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Introducing more customized products causes complexity costs, which are hard to estimate and measure. Researchers and practitioners have therefore developed approaches to measure these costs. This paper reviews the current approaches and reveals a lack of a holistic view on the underlying problem and, hence, deficits to certain economic questions. We therefore suggest using the Extended Axiomatic Design (EAD) framework as an interdisciplinary model that adresses the economic consequences of variety-induced complexity.

Keywords

complexityvariety-induced complexitycost managementproduct design
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference , Volume 1 , May 2020 , pp. 647 - 656
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Ameri, F. et al. (2008), “Engineering design complexity: an investigation of methods and measures”, Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 19 No. 2-3, pp. 161–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-008-0053-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anand, V., Balakrishnan, R. and Labro, E. (2019), “A Framework for Conducting Numerical Experiments on Cost System Design”, Journal of Management Accounting Research, Vol. 31 No. 1, pp. 41–61. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-52057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, W. et al. (2015), “Complexity costs evaluation in product families by incorporating change propagation”, 2015 Annual IEEE Systems Conference (SysCon) Proceedings, Vancouver, pp. 37–43. https://doi.org/10.1109/SYSCON.2015.7116726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayer, T. (2010), Integriertes Variantenmanagement. Variantenkostenbewertung mit faktorenanalytischen Komplexitätstreibern, Rainer Hampp Verlag, Mering, 2010.Google Scholar
Bliss, C. (2000), Management von Komplexität, Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-10720-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, R. and Kaplan, R. (1991), “Profit Priorities from Activity-Based-Costing”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 69 No. 3, p. 130.Google Scholar
Cooper, R. and Kaplan, R.S. (1988), “Measure Costs Right: Make the Right Decision”, in Harvard Business Review, Vol. 5, 66th ed., pp. 96–103.Google Scholar
Danilovic, M. and Browning, T.R. (2007), “Managing complex product development projects with design structure matrices and domain mapping matrices”, International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 25 No. 3, pp. 300–314, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.11.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demski, J.S. (2008), Managerial uses of accounting information, Springer series in accounting scholarship, Vol. 4, Springer, Boston. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77451-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorman, P. (2014), Microeconomics, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37434-0Google Scholar
Fixson, S. (2006), “A Roadmap for Product Architecture Costing”, In: Simpson, T.W., Jiao, J.R. and Siddique, Z. (Eds.), Product Platform and Product Family Design: Methods and Applications, Springer Science+Business Media LLC, Boston, MA, pp. 305–334, https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-29197-0_13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedl, B. (2010), Kostenrechnung, Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag, München, https://doi.org/10.1524/9783486710267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, C. and Golenhofen, F. (2019), Mastering Disruption and Innovation in Product Management, Springer International Publishing, Cham, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93512-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, R., Schuller, M. and Wilhelmer, R. (2014), Portfoliomanagement in Unternehmen, Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-00260-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Mortensen and Hvam, . (2012), “Calculation of Complexity Costs - An Approach for Rationalizing a Product Program”, in Hansen, , Rasmussen, , Jřrgensen, and Tollestrup, (Eds.), DS 71: Proceedings of NordDesign 2012, Aarlborg, Denmark, August 22-24, 2012, The Design Society, Aarlborg.Google Scholar
Horváth, P. and Mayer, R. (1995), “Konzeption und Entwicklungen der Prozeßkostenrechnung”, In: Männel, W. (Ed.), Prozeßkostenrechnung, Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden, pp. 59–86, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-16322-0_7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, S.J. et al. (2008), “Product variety and manufacturing complexity in assembly systems and supply chains”, CIRP Annals, Vol. 57 No. 1, pp. 45–48, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2008.03.138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, R.S. and Cooper, R. (1998), Cost & effect: Using integrated cost systems to drive profitability and performance, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.Google Scholar
Kersten, W. et al. (2006), “Complexity Management in Logistics and ETO-Supply Chains”, In: Blecker, T. and Kersten, W. (Eds.), Complexity Management in Supply Chains, Concepts, Tools and Methods, Operations and technology management, Erich Schmidt Verlag, Berlin, pp. 325–342.Google Scholar
Labro, E. (2004), “The Cost Effects of Component Commonality: A Literature Review Through a Management-Accounting Lens”, Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, Vol. 6 No. 4, pp. 358–367, https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.1040.0047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lechner, A., Klingebiel, K. and Wagenitz, A. (2011), “Evaluation of Product Variant-driven Complexity Costs and Performance Impacts in the Automotive Logistics with Variety-driven Activity-based Costing”, International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists: IMECS 2011, Hong Kong, March 16-18, 2011, International Association of Engineers, Hong Kong, pp. 1088–1096.Google Scholar
Maier, M.W. (1998), “Architecting principles for systems-of-systems”, Systems Engineering, Vol. 1 No. 4, pp. 267–284. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2334-5837.1996.tb02054.x3.0.CO;2-D>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maurer, M. (2017), Complexity Management in Engineering Design – a Primer, Springer Vieweg, Berlin, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53448-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mertens, K.G. (2020), Measure and manage your product costs right: Using an extended axiomatic design for measuring and managing costs [PhD Thesis]. Hamburg University of Technology, Hamburg.Google Scholar
Meyer, M., Meßerschmidt, O. and Mertens, K.G. (2019), “How much does variety-induced complexity actually cost? Linking axiomatic design with cost modelling”, In: Schröder, M. and Wegner, K. (Eds.), Logistik im Wandel der Zeit – Von der Produktionssteuerung zu vernetzten Supply Chains, Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, pp. 813–827, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-25412-4_39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neff, M. (2016), Komplexität und Varianz – von Ursachen, Lösungen und deren Wirken, Smart Variant Con, Berlin, June 22-23, 2016.Google Scholar
Orfi, N., Terpenny, J. and Sahin-Sariisik, A. (2011), “Harnessing Product Complexity: Step 1—Establishing Product Complexity Dimensions and Indicators”, The Engineering Economist, Vol. 56 No. 1, pp. 59–79, https://doi.org/10.1080/0013791X.2010.549935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, and Simpson, T. (2006), “An Activity-Based Costing Method to Support Porduct Family Design”, in Simpson, T.W., Jiao, J.R. and Siddique, Z. (Eds.), Product Platform and Product Family Design: Methods and Applications, Springer Science+Business, Boston, pp. 335–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-29197-0_14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ripperda, S. and Krause, D. (2017), “Cost Effects of Modular Product Family Structures: Methods and Quantification of Impacts to Support Decision Making”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 139 No. 2, pp. 21103-1–21103-12, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4035430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuh, G. (1988), Gestaltung und Bewertung von Produktvarianten ein Beitrag zur systematischen Planung von Serienprodukten, Berichte aus der Produktionstechnik, VDI-Verlag, Düsseldorf.Google Scholar
Schuh, G. (2005), Produktkomplexität managen: Strategien – Methoden – Tools, 2nd, revised and extended edition, Hanser, München.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuh, G. and Kaiser, A. (1995), “Kostenmanagement in Entwicklung und Produktion mit der Ressourcenorientierten Prozeßkostenrechnung”, In: Männel, W. (Ed.), Prozeßkostenrechnung, Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden, pp. 369–382, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-16322-0_28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuh, G. et al. (2017), “Product Production Complexity Research: Developments and Opportunities”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 60, pp. 344–349, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.01.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shephard, R.W. (1981), Cost and Production Functions, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-51578-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skirde, H. (2015), Kostenorientierte Bewertung modularer Produktarchitekturen [PhD thesis]. Hamburg University of Technology, Hamburg, 2015.Google Scholar
Skirde, H., Kersten, W. and Schröder, M. (2016), “Measuring the Cost Effects of Modular Product Architectures — A Conceptual Approach”, International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, Vol. 13 No. 04, pp. 1650017-1–1650017-23, https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877016500176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suh, N.P. (2001), Axiomatic design: Advances and applications, The MIT-Pappalardo series in mechanical engineering, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Ulrich, K. (1994), “Fundamentals of Product Modularity”, In: Dasu, S. and Eastman, C. (Eds.), Management of Design, Vol. 14, Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp. 219–231, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1390-8_12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, W. and Lasch, R. (2016), “Complexity drivers in manufacturing companies: a literature review”, Logistics Research, Vol. 9 No. 1, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12159-016-0152-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, S.A. and Perumal, A. (2010), Waging war on complexity costs: Reshape your cost structure, free up cash flows, and boost productivity by attacking process, product, and organizational complexity, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar