Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-t27h7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-24T23:26:13.915Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

REQUIREMENTS FOR DIAGRAMING IN THE DESIGN OF MENTAL HEALTH DELIVERY SERVICES

Part of: Socio-technical Issues in Design

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2020

A. Komashie  and
P. J. Clarkson
A. Komashie*
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge, United Kingdom THIS.Institute, United Kingdom
P. J. Clarkson
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
*
*[email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Delivering good quality mental health services remains a top priority in the English National Health Service (NHS). An approach to designing better delivery systems that takes into account the complexities of mental health services is highly desirable. This paper follows previous work that have sought to identify the key components of mental health delivery systems and explored the nature of the relationships between them. The paper presents the results of a qualitative thematic analysis of the requirements for diagrams as tools for describing and representing delivery systems in mental health.

Keywords

healthcare designcomplex systemsco-design
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference , Volume 1 , May 2020 , pp. 1959 - 1968
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

del Aguila, I.M., Palma, J. and Tunez, S. (2014), “Milestones in Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering History: A Comparative Review”, The Scientific World Journal, Vol. 2014, pp. 1–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blackwell, A. (2019), “A Pattern Language for the Design of Diagrams”, In: Richards, C. (Ed.), Elements of Diagramming: Design Theories, Analyses and Methods, Routledge, pp. 250.Google Scholar
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006), “Using thematic analysis in psychology”, Qualitative Research in Psychology, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarkson, P.J. (2018), “What has engineering design to say about healthcare improvement?”, Design Science, Vol. 4, pp. 1–35.Google Scholar
Clarkson, P.J. et al. (2017), Engineering Better Care: A Systems Approach to Health and Care Design and Continuous Improvement, Royal Academy of Engineering, London,Google Scholar
Colligan, L. et al. (2010), “Does the process map influence the outcome of quality improvement work? A comparison of a sequential flow diagram and a hierarchical task analysis diagram”, BMC Health Services Research, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crilly, N., Blackwell, A.F. and Clarkson, P.J. (2006), “Graphic elicitation: using research diagrams as interview stimuli”, Qualitative Research, Vol. 6, pp. 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department of Health and Design Council (2003), Design for Patient Safety: A System-Wide Design-Led Approach to Tackling Patient Safety in the NHS, London, UK.Google Scholar
Etikan, I., Musa, S.A. and Alkassim, R.S. (2016), “Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling”, American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, B. (2008), “The Roots of the Business Process Mapping”, BP Trends, No. June, pp. 1–6.Google Scholar
Jun, G.T. et al. (2009), “Health care process modelling: which method when?”, International Journal for Quality in Health Care, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 214–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komashie, A. and Clarkson, P.J. (2018), “Designing mental health delivery systems: Describing the relationship between system components”, Proceedings of the 15th International Design Conference, DESIGN 2018, Vol. 6, pp. 2669–2680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komashie, A. et al. (2017), “Designing mental health delivery systems: Where do we start?”, DS 87-3 Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 17) Vol 3: Product, Services and Systems Design, Vancouver, Canada, 21-25.08.2017, Vol. 3.Google Scholar
Mincarone, P. et al. (2018), “Standardized languages and notations for graphical modelling of patient care processes: A systematic review”, International Journal for Quality in Health Care, Vol. 30 No. 3, pp. 169–177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nowell, L.S. et al. (2017), “Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria”, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Object Management Group (2011), “OMG Systems Modelling Language (OMG SysML) Version 1.3”, USA.Google Scholar
Purcell, A.T. and Gero, J.S. (1998), “Drawings and the design process”, Design Studies, Vol. 19 No. 4, pp. 389–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ram, S. and Liu, J. (2008), “A Semiotics Framework for Analyzing Data Provenance Research”, Journal of Computing Science and Engineering, Vol. 2 No. 3, pp. 221–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, P.P. et al. (2005), Building a Better Delivery System: A New Engineering/Health Care Partnership, The National Academy Press, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
Staniszewska, S. et al. (2011), “Developing the evidence base of patient and public involvement in health and social care research: The case for measuring impact”, International Journal of Consumer Studies, Vol. 35 No. 6, pp. 628–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Störrle, H. et al. (2018), “Poster: How do modelers read UML diagrams?: Preliminary results from an eye-Tracking study”, Proceedings - International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 396–397.Google Scholar
Störrle, H. and Fish, A. (2013), “Towards an operationalization of the ‘Physics of Notations’ for the analysis of visual languages”, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), Vol. 8107 LNCS, pp. 104–120.Google Scholar
Tversky, B. (2011), “Visualizing thought”, Topics in Cognitive Science, Vol. 3, pp. 499–535.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tversky, B. (2015), “The cognitive design of tools of thought”, Review of Philosophy and Psychology, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 99–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WHO (2000), Health Systems: Improving Performance, World Health Report 2000, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Yusuf, S., Kagdi, H. and Maletic, J.I. (2007), “Assessing the comprehension of UML class diagrams via eye tracking”, IEEE International Conference on Program Comprehension, pp. 113–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar