Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T06:03:57.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

RAISING VALUE AND SUSTAINABILITY AWARENESS FOR CRITICAL MATERIALS: A SERIOUS GAME FOR THE AEROSPACE SECTOR

Part of: Design Organisation and Management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2020

G. W. Scurati ,
J. W. Nylander ,
S. I. Hallstedt ,
F. Ferrise  and
M. Bertoni
G. W. Scurati*
Affiliation:
Politecnico di Milano, Italy
J. W. Nylander
Affiliation:
GKN Aerospace, Sweden
S. I. Hallstedt
Affiliation:
Blekinge Institute of Technology, Sweden
F. Ferrise
Affiliation:
Politecnico di Milano, Italy
M. Bertoni
Affiliation:
Blekinge Institute of Technology, Sweden
*
*[email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Aviation strives today to include environmental and social considerations as drivers for decision making in design. This paper proposes a serious game to raise awareness of the value and cost implications of being ‘sustainability compliant’ when developing aerospace sub-systems and components. After describing the development of the game, from needfinding to prototyping and testing, the paper discusses the results from verification activities with practitioners, revealing the ability of the game to raise sustainability awareness and support negotiation across disciplinary boundaries in design.

Keywords

serious gamesustainabilitydecision makingrisk managementcritical materials
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference , Volume 1 , May 2020 , pp. 737 - 746
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

ACARE (2004), Strategic Research Agenda 2- Executive summary. Advisory Council for Aeronautics Research in Europe.Google Scholar
Bachen, C.M. et al. (2016), “How do presence, flow, and character identification affect players’ empathy and interest in learning from a serious computer game?”, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 64, pp. 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertoni, M., Hallstedt, S. and Isaksson, O. (2015), “A Model-Based approach for sustainability and value assessment in the aerospace value chain”, Advances In Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 7 No. 6, pp. 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertoni, M. (2017), “Introducing sustainability in value models to support design decision making: A systematic review”, Sustainability, Vol. 9 No. 6, p. 994. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9060994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broman, G.I. and Robèrt, K.H. (2017), “A framework for strategic sustainable development”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 140, pp. 17–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dib, H. and Adamo-Villani, N. (2013), “Serious sustainability challenge game to promote teaching and learning of building sustainability”, Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, Vol. 28 No. 5, p. A4014007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000357Google Scholar
EASA (2019), European aviation environmental report [online]. European Aviation Safety Agency. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/transport/sites/transport/files/2019-aviation-environmental-report.pdf (accessed 05-11.2019).Google Scholar
Hallstedt, S. and Isaksson, O. (2017), “Material criticality assessment in early phases of sustainable product development”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 161, pp. 40–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirose, Y., Sugiura, J. and Shimomoto, K. (2004), “Industrial waste management simulation game and its educational effect”, Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 58–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-003-0108-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaziulusoy, A.I., Boyle, C. and McDowall, R. (2013), “System innovation for sustainability: a systemic double-flow scenario method for companies”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 45, pp. 104–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.05.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kousoulidou, M. and Lonza, L. (2016), “Biofuels in aviation: Fuel demand and CO2 emissions evolution in Europe toward 2030”, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 46, pp. 166–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2016.03.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leigh Star, S., (2010), “This is not a boundary object: Reflections on the origin of a concept”, Science, Technology, & Human Values, Vol. 35 No. 5, pp. 601–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubin, D.A. and Esty, D.C. (2010), “The sustainability imperative”, Harvard business review, Vol. 88 No. 5, pp. 42–50.Google Scholar
Mitgutsch, K. and Alvarado, N. (2012), “Purposeful by design: a serious game design assessment framework”, Proceedings of the International Conference on the foundations of digital games, ACM, pp. 121–128. https://doi.org/10.1145/2282338.2282364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morganti, L. et al. (2017), “Gaming for Earth: Serious games and gamification to engage consumers in pro-environmental behaviours for energy efficiency”, Energy Research & Social Science, Vol. 29, pp. 95–102, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.05.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumayer, E. (1999), Weak versus strong sustainability. Books.Google Scholar
Rath, K. et al. (2013), “Tutorial sustainable innovations - An innovative role-play concept for education”, Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED13), Design for Harmonies, Vol. 8 : Design Education, Seoul, Korea, 19-22.08. 2013.Google Scholar
Riedel, J.C.K.H. and Hauge, J.B. (2011), “State of the art of serious games for business and industry”, 17th International Conference on Concurrent Enterprising, IEEE, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
Schöggl, J.P., Baumgartner, R.J. and Hofer, D. (2017), “Improving sustainability performance in early phases of product design: A checklist for sustainable product development tested in the automotive industry”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 140, pp. 1602–1617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Wal, M.M. et al. (2016), “Can computer models be used for social learning? A serious game in water management”, Environmental modelling & software, Vol. 75, pp. 119–132, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.10.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watze, M. and Hallstedt, S.I. (2019), “Profile model for management of sustainability integration in engineering design requirements”, Journal of Cleaner Production, p. 119155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119155Google Scholar
Whalen, K.A. et al. (2018), “‘All they do is win’: Lessons learned from use of a serious game for Circular Economy education”, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 135, pp. 335–345. issn: 0921-3449. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.06.021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willard, B. (2012), The new sustainability advantage: seven business case benefits of a triple bottom line, New Society Publishers.Google Scholar
Witik, R.A. et al. (2012), “Economic and environmental assessment of alternative production methods for composite aircraft components”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 29, pp. 91–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar