Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T19:04:40.638Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A METHODOLOGY TO IDENTIFY AND ADDRESS IMPROVEMENT POTENTIALS IN COMMUNICATION PROCESSES OF DISTRIBUTED PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT – AN INITIAL APPROACH

Part of: Design Organisation and Management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2020

K. Duehr ,
M. Hirsch ,
A. Albers  and
N. Bursac
K. Duehr*
Affiliation:
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany
M. Hirsch
Affiliation:
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany
A. Albers
Affiliation:
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany
N. Bursac
Affiliation:
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany
*
*[email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The advantages of distributed development teams help companies to address megatrends like globalization and individualization. However, development teams are facing challenges according to increasing requirements on communication processes. This approach provides a methodology to identify and address improvement potentials in communication processes of distributed product development by including the dimensions technology, organization and human involved in the development process. The validation of the methodology's process steps was carried out together with a machine tool manufacturer.

Keywords

distributed designcommunicationmodularisationhuman-centred designagile systems design (ASD)
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference , Volume 1 , May 2020 , pp. 541 - 550
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Ahuja, J. (2017), “Modelling the Success Factors of Virtual Team”, Indian Journal of Science and Technology, Vol. 9, pp. 48. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i48/105874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albers, A. et al. (2005), “SPALTEN problem solving methodology in the product development”, 15th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED), Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
Albers, A. et al. (2019a), “The Product Developer in the Centre of Product Development: A Systematic Literature Review on Describing Factors”, Proceedings of 22nd International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED19), Delf, The Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albers, A. et al. (2019b), “A systematic approach to situation-adequate mechatronic system development by ASD - Agile Systems Design”, 29th CIRP Design 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.03.312Google Scholar
Albers, A. et al. (2016a), “15 Years of SPALTEN Problem Solving Methodology in Product Development”, DS 85-1: Proceedings of NordDesign 2016, Volume 1, Trondheim, Norway, 10th-12th August, pp. 411–420.Google Scholar
Albers, A. et al. (2016b), “iPeM – Integrated Product Engineering Model in Context of Product Generation Engineering”, Proceedings of 26th CIRP Design 2016, S. 100–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.04.168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bavendiek, A.-K. et al. (2018), “Supporting distributed design teams with regard to processes, methods & tools and competencies & qualifications”, In: Proceedings of NordDesign 2018, Linköping, Sweden, 14th-17th August 2018.Google Scholar
Bischoff, S., Aleksandrova, G. and Flachskampf, P. (2011), “Open Innovation - Strategie der offenen Unternehmensgrenzen für KMU”, In: Jeschke, S., Isenhardt, I. and Henning, K. (Eds.), Automation, Communication and Cybernetics in Science and Engineering 2009/2010, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16208-4_43Google Scholar
Blessing, L.T.M. and Chakrabarti, A. (2009), DRM, a Design Research Methodology, Springer London, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-587-1_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boutellier, R., Gassmann, O. and Zedtwitz, M. (2008), Managing Global Innovation: Uncovering the Secrets of Future Competitiveness, Third edition, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg.10.1007/978-3-540-68952-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullinger, H.-J., Wörner, K. and Prieto, J. (1997), Wissensmanagement heute: Daten, Fakten, Trends; Ergebnisse einer Unternehmensstudie des Fraunhofer-Instituts für Arbeitswirtschaft und Organisation in Zsarb. mit dem Manager Magazin, Fraunhofer Institute for Industrial Engineering IAO.Google Scholar
Duehr, K. et al. (2019), “Understanding Distributed Product Engineering: Dealing with Complexity for Situation- and Demand-Oriented Process Design”, 29th CIRP Design 2019, Vol. 84, pp. 136–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.04.200Google Scholar
Ebert, C. (2019), “Industry Trends 2019. Convergence Drives Competitiveness and Innovation”, A White Paper by Vector Consulting Services, Vector Consulting Services, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Gerhards, S. and Trauner, B. (2011), Wissensmanagement: 7 Bausteine für die Umsetzung in der Praxis, Carl Hanser Verlag GmbH Co KG, München.10.3139/9783446426795.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, E.A. (2005), Arbeitssysteme und Arbeitsprozesse: Mensch, Technik, Organisation, Vol. 39, vdf Hochschulverlag AG, Insitut für Arbeitsforschung und Organisationsberatung.Google Scholar
Horwitz, F.M., Bravington, D. and Silvis, U. (2006), “The promise of virtual teams: identifying key factors in effectiveness and failure”, Journal of European Industrial Training, Vol. 30 No. 6, pp. 472–494. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090590610688843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hossain, E., Babar, M.A. and Paik, H.-Y. (2009), “Using Scrum in Global Software Development: A Systematic Literature Review”, in Fourth IEEE International Conference on Global Software Engineering, 13-16 July 2009, Limerick, Ireland, pp. 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1109/icgse.2009.25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kern, E.-M. (2005), “Verteilte Produktentwicklung - Rahmenkonzept und Vorgehensweise zur organisatorischen Gestaltung”, Zugl.: Hamburg, Techn. Univ., Habil.-Schr., GITO, Berlin, 2005.Google Scholar
Konradt, U. and Hertel, G. (2002), Management virtueller Teams: Von der Telearbeit zum virtuellen Unternehmen, Management und Karriere, Beltz Verlag, Weinheim.Google Scholar
Kuster, J. et al. (2011), Handbuch Projektmanagement, Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, Berlin, Heidelberg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipnack, J. and Stamps, J. (1997), Virtual teams: Reaching across space, time, and organizations with technology, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, Chichester, Weinheim, Brisbane, Singapore, Toronto. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0024-6301(98)90279-5Google Scholar
Meyer-Eschenbach, A. and Blessing, L. (2005), “Experience with Distributed Development of Household Appliances”, Proceedings ICED 05, the 15th International Conference on Engineering Design, Melbourne, Australia, 15-18 August 2005.Google Scholar
Michulitz, C., Trantow, S. and Meinhold, J. (2008), “Qualitätsmanagement: Lektion 12”, In: Change Management, Euroforum Verlag, pp. 37–38.Google Scholar
Müller, M. et al. (2017), “Efficient Application Of MBSE Using Reference Models: A PGE Case Study”, 21st International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED17), Vancouver, Canada, 21-25 August 2017.Google Scholar
Ostergaard, K.J. and Summers, J.D. (2009), “Development of a systematic classification and taxonomy of collaborative design activities”, Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 57–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544820701499654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stöger, G. and Thomas, G. (2007), Teams ohne Grenzen: und es geht doch: virtuelle Teams erfolgreich führen, Orell Füssli Verlag AG, 2007.Google Scholar
Ulich, E. (1997), “Mensch, Technik, Organisation: ein europäisches Produktionskonzept”, In: Ulich, E. (Ed.), Unternehmen arbeitspsychologisch bewerten: Berücksichtigung von Mensch, Technik und Organisation, vdf Hochschulverlag an der ETH, Zürich.Google Scholar
Weinkauf, K. and Woywode, M.J. (2004), “Erfolgsfaktoren von virtuellen Teams. Ergebnisse einer aktuellen Studie”, Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung: ZfbF, Vol. 56 No. 4, pp. 393–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03372742Google Scholar