Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T07:02:26.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

INFLUENCE OF INNOVATION, COMPLEXITY AND NEWNESS ON SUCCESS IN NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS: A SURVEY IN NORWEGIAN MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY

Part of: Design Organisation and Management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2020

C. Beste ,
T. Welo  and
N. Olsson
C. Beste*
Affiliation:
Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway
T. Welo
Affiliation:
Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway
N. Olsson
Affiliation:
Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway
*
*[email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

There is little tolerance for deviation in time, budget and quality in the execution of product development projects. On the other hand, the project environment is gaining complexity. Changes on project scope are daily business. We set up an initial hypothesis, that unplanned changes -newness- has negative impact on projects. We developed and executed therefore a survey about factors belonging to innovation, complexity and newness to test their perceived impact on project success. Our data show a positive correlation between unsuccessful projects and newness, which is discussed in the paper.

Keywords

innovation managementproject managementnew product developmentcomplexityperformance indicators
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference , Volume 1 , May 2020 , pp. 511 - 520
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Amason, A.C. et al. (1995), “Conflict: An important dimension in successful management teams”, Organ. Dyn., Vol. 24, pp. 20–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(95)90069-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baccarini, D. (1996), “The concept of project complexity—a review”, Int. J. Proj. Manag., Vol. 14, pp. 201–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beste, C., Welo, T. and Ringen, G. (2019), “Newness and Outcomes in Commodity-Driven New-Product Development Projects: A Survey in the Norwegian Manufacturing Industry”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 84, pp. 749–754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.03.269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caron, F. (2013), Managing the Continuum: Certainty, Uncertainty, Unpredictability in Large Engineering Projects, Springer, Milano.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cennon, J. (2019), What Are Commodities and How Do You Trade Them? 2019.Google Scholar
Chopra, S. and Meindl, P. (2007), Supply chain management: strategy, planning, and operation, 3rd ed. Pearson/Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.Google Scholar
Cooke-Davies, T. (2004), Project Success, in: The Wiley Guide to Managing Projects. pp. 99–122.Google Scholar
Cooke-Davies, T. (2002), “The ‘real’ success factors on projects”, Int. J. Proj. Manag., Vol. 20, pp. 185–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(01)00067-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, R.G. (2001), Winning at new products: accelerating the process from idea to launch, 3rd ed. Perseus Pub, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Enke, M., Geigenmüller, A. and Leischnig, A. (Eds.) (2014), Commodity Marketing: Grundlagen, Besonderheiten, Erfahrungen, 3., aktual. und erw. Aufl. ed. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geraldi, J.G. (2008), “The balance between order and chaos in multi-project firms: A conceptual model”, Int. J. Proj. Manag., Vol. 26, pp. 348–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.08.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanna, A.S. et al. (2002), “Quantitative Definition of Projects Impacted by Change Orders”, J. Constr. Eng. Manag., Vol. 128, pp. 57–64. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2002)128:1(57)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauschildt, J. et al. (2016), Innovationsmanagement, 6., vollständig aktualisierte und überarbeitete Auflage. ed, Vahlens Handbücher, Verlag Franz Vahlen, München.Google Scholar
Iansiti, M. (1995), “Shooting the Rapids: Managing Product Development in Turbulent Environments”, Calif. Manage. Rev., Vol. 38, pp. 37–58. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Invernizzi, D.C., Locatelli, G. and Brookes, N.J. (2018), “The need to improve communication about scope changes: frustration as an indicator of operational inefficiencies”, Prod. Plan. Control.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johannessen, J.-A., Bjørn, O. and Lumpkin, G.T. (2001), “Innovation as newness: what is new, how new, and new to whom?”, Eur. J. Innov. Manag., Vol. 4, pp. 20–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, G. (2014), Statistics for management and economics.Google Scholar
Kerzner, H. (2013), Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling, Eleventh edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Laihonen, H. et al. (2012), “Measuring the productivity impacts of new ways of working”, J. Facil. Manag., Vol. 10, pp. 102–113. https://doi.org/10.1108/14725961211218749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, J.P. (2002), Fundamentals of project management: developing core competencies to help outperform the competition, 2nd ed. AMACOM, New York.Google Scholar
Love, P.E.D., Irani, Z. and Edwards, D.J. (2004), “A Rework Reduction Model for Construction Projects”, IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag., Vol. 51, pp. 426–440. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2004.835092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marle, F. and Vidal, L.-A. (2016), Managing complex, high risk projects: a guide to basic and advanced project management, Engineering.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newcomer, K.E., Hatry, H.P. and Wholey, J.S. (n.d.), “Chapter Fourteen Using Surveys”, In: Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation, Essential Texts for Nonprofit and Public Leadership and Management. pp. 344–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peponis, J. et al. (2007), “Designing Space to Support Knowledge Work”, Environ. Behav. 39, pp. 815–840. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916506297216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pichler, R. (2016), Strategize: product strategy and product roadmap practices for the digital age.Google Scholar
Pinto, J.K., Rouhiainen, P. and Trailer, J.W. (2000), “Project Success and Customer Satisfaction: Toward a Formalized Linkage Mechanism”, In: Lundin, R.A. and Hartman, F. (Eds) Projects as Business Constituents and Guiding Motives, Springer, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Pinto, J.K. and Slevin, D.P. (1987), “Critical factors in successful project implementation”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 34 No. 1, pp. 22–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinto, J.K. and Slevin, D.P. (1988), “Project success: Definitions and measurement techniques”, Project Management Journal, Vol. XIX No. 1, pp. 67–71.Google Scholar
PMI 2017. Project Management Institute A guide to the project management body of knowledge, Sixth edition. Ed., PMBOK guide. Project Management Institute, Newtown Square, PA.Google Scholar
Rogers, E. and Shoemaker, F. (1971), Communication of innovations; a cross-cultural approach. Free Press.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J.A. (1934), The theory of economic development; an inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Utterback, J.M. and Abernathy, W.J. (1975), “A dynamic model of process and product innovation”, Omega Vol. 3, pp. 639–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0483(75)90068-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veitch, J.A. et al. (2007), “A model of satisfaction with open-plan office conditions: COPE field findings”, J. Environ. Psychol., Vol. 27, pp. 177–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.04.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vernon, R. (1966), “International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle”, Q. J. Econ. Vol. 80, pp. 190–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vidal, L.-A., Marle, F. and Bocquet, J.-C. (2011), “Measuring project complexity using the Analytic Hierarchy Process”, Int. J. Proj. Manag., Vol. 29, pp. 718–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, W. and Lasch, R. (2016), “Complexity drivers in manufacturing companies: a literature review”, Logist. Res., p. 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vuolle, M. (2010), “Productivity impacts of mobile office service”, Int. J. Serv. Technol. Manag., Vol. 14, p. 326. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSTM.2010.035782CrossRefGoogle Scholar