Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T06:27:29.625Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

IMMERSIVE ABSTRACTION: A NEW MORPHOLOGY OF INTUITIVE INTERACTION WITH SYSTEM MODELS

Part of: Design Innovation, Information and Knowledge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2020

I. Gräßler  and
J. Pottebaum
I. Gräßler
Affiliation:
Paderborn University, Germany
J. Pottebaum*
Affiliation:
Paderborn University, Germany
*
*[email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The value of models is well recognised in product and systems engineering. Modelling languages and diagrams are used to capture mental models and to handle model complexity. Literature research indicates that there are only very few approaches to utilise the potential of virtual and augmented reality for supporting tasks in model based (systems) engineering. The paper at hand contributes a new morphology of intuitive interaction for Immersive Abstraction as a holistic approach to extend that coverage. It presents a holistic framework to categorise solutions and future research directions.

Keywords

model-based engineeringvirtual engineering (VE)3D modellingsystems engineering (SE)visualisation
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference , Volume 1 , May 2020 , pp. 1295 - 1304
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Anwer, N. and Mathieu, L. (2016), “From reverse engineering to shape engineering in mechanical design”, CIRP Annals, Vol. 65 No. 1, pp. 165–168, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2016.04.052Google Scholar
Arqueros, N.J., Prieto, P.A. and Zúñiga, M.D. (2012), “A new tool for immersive 3D free-form surface modelling and refining”, in Marjanović, D. (Ed.), Design 2012: Proceedings of the 12th International Design Conference, Dubrovnik, 21-24 May 2012, Design Society, pp. 365–372.Google Scholar
Badke-Schaub, P. et al. (2007), “Mental models in design teams: a valid approach to performance in design collaboration?”, CoDesign, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 5–20.10.1080/15710880601170768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billinghurst, M., Kato, H. and Poupyrev, I. (2008), “Tangible augmented reality”, in Hart, J.C. (Ed.), ACM SIGGRAPH Asia 2008: Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques Conference, Singapore, ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, pp. 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1145/1508044.1508051Google Scholar
Bizer, C., Heath, T. and Berners-Lee, T. (2011), “Linked Data”, in Sheth, A. (Ed.), Semantic services, interoperability, and web applications: Emerging concepts, Vol. 284, IGI Global, Hershey, pp. 205–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blessing, L.T.M. and Chakrabarti, A. (2009), DRM, a Design Research Methodology, Springer London, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R.A. (2010), “Conceptual modelling in 3D virtual worlds for process communication”, in Proceedings of the Seventh Asia-Pacific Conference on Conceptual Modelling (APCCM 2010), Brisbane, Australia, Australian Computer Society, Darlington, pp. 25–32.Google Scholar
Brown, R.A., Recker, J. and West, S. (2011), “Using virtual worlds for collaborative business process modeling”, Business Process Management Journal, Vol. 17 No. 3, pp. 546–564, https://doi.org/10.1108/14637151111136414Google Scholar
Buchmann, R.A. and Karagiannis, D. (2016), “Enriching Linked Data with Semantics from Domain-Specific Diagrammatic Models”, Business & Information Systems Engineering, Vol. 58 No. 5, pp. 341–353.Google Scholar
Burdea, G.C. and Coiffet, P. (2003), Virtual Reality Technology, Wiley - IEEE Ser, 2nd ed., John Wiley & Sons Incorporated, New York.Google Scholar
Chinosi, M. and Trombetta, A. (2012), “BPMN: An introduction to the standard”, Computer Standards & Interfaces, Vol. 34 No. 1, pp. 124–134, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2011.06.002Google Scholar
Czarnecki, K. and Helsen, S. (2006), “Feature-based survey of model transformation approaches”, IBM Systems Journal, Vol. 45 No. 3, pp. 621–645, https://doi.org/10.1147/sj.453.0621Google Scholar
Ekströmer, P. et al. (2019), “Shedding Light on Game Engines and Virtual Reality for Design Ideation”, in Wartzack, S., Schleich, B., Guerreiro Gonçalves, M., Eisenbart, B. and Völkl, H. (Eds.), Responsible Design for Our Future: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED19), Delft, 5-8 August 2019, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 2003–2010.Google Scholar
Estefan, J.A. (2008), Survey of Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) Methodologies, available at: http://www.omgsysml.org/MBSE_Methodology_Survey_RevB.pdf (accessed 9 July 2019).Google Scholar
Gräßler, I., Oleff, C. and Taplick, P. (2019), “Augmented Reality für die Vermittlung von Systems Engineering- Kompetenzen”, in Bertram, T., Corves, B., Gräßler, I. and Janschek, K. (Eds.), Tagungsband der Fachtagung Mechatronik 2019, Paderborn, 27-28 March 2019, pp. 180–185. https://doi.org/10.17619/UNIPB/1-770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gräßler, I. et al. (2018), “Semi-Automatized Assessment of Requirement Interrelations”, in Marjanović, D., Štorga, M., Škec, S., Bojčetić, N. and Pavković, N. (Eds.), Design 2018: Proceedings of the 15th International Design Conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 21-24 May 2018, Design Society, pp. 325–334. https://doi.org/10.21278/idc.2018.0298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregorovič, L., Polasek, I. and Sobota, B. (2015), “Software Model Creation with Multidimensional UML”, in Khalil, I. (Ed.), Information and communication technology: Third IFIP TC 5/8 international conference, ICT-EurAsia 2015, and 9th IFIP WG 8.9 working conference, CONFENIS 2015, held as part of WCC 2015, Daejeon, Korea, October 4-7, 2015 proceedings, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 9357, Springer, Cham, pp. 343–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24315-3_35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruber, T.R. (1993), “A translation approach to portable ontology specifications”, Knowledge acquisition, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 199–220.10.1006/knac.1993.1008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
INCOSE (2014), Systems Engineering Handbook: A Guide for System Life Cycle Processes and Activities, San Diego.Google Scholar
Kleiner, S. and Kramer, C. (2013), “Model Based Design with Systems Engineering Based on RFLP Using V6”, in Abramovici, M. and Stark, R. (Eds.), Smart Product Engineering: Proceedings of the 23rd CIRP Design Conference, Bochum, 11-13 March 2013, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 93–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leino, S.-P.S., Koivisto, T. and Riitahuhta, A. (2013), “Value of virtual prototyping – A strategic resource based view”, in Lindemann, U., Srinivasan, V., Kim, Y.S., Lee, S.W., Clarkson, J. and Cascini, G. (Eds.), Design for harmonies: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED13), Seoul, Korea, 19-22 August 2013, Design Society, Castle Cary, Somerset, pp. 249–258.Google Scholar
Lohmann, S. et al. (2016), “Visualizing ontologies with VOWL”, Semantic Web, Vol. 7 No. 4, pp. 399–419. https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-150200Google Scholar
Machi, L.A. and McEvoy, B.T. (2016), The literature review: Six steps to success, Third Edition, Corwin, Thousand Oaks, California.10.1093/obo/9780199756810-0169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahboob, A. et al. (2019), “The Reuse of SysML Behaviour Models for Creating Product Use Cases in Virtual Reality”, in Wartzack, S., Schleich, B., Guerreiro Gonçalves, M., Eisenbart, B. and Völkl, H. (Eds.), Responsible Design for Our Future: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED19), Delft, 5-8 August 2019, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 2021–2030. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.208Google Scholar
McIntosh, P.M. (2009), “X3D-UML: User-Centred Design, Implementation and Evaluation of 3D UMLUsing X3D”, Dissertation, School of Computer Science and Information Technology, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
OASIS (2019), Open Services for Lifecycle Collaboration, available at: https://open-services.net/ (accessed 24 November 2019).Google Scholar
Oberhauser, R. and Pogolski, C. (2019), “VR-EA: Virtual Reality Visualization of Enterprise Architecture Models with ArchiMate and BPMN”, in Shishkov, B. (Ed.), Business Modeling and Software Design: 9th International Symposium, BMSD 2019, Lisbon, Portugal, July 1-3, 2019, Proceedings, Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, Vol. 356, 1st ed., Springer International Publishing; Imprint; Springer, Cham, pp. 170–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24854-3_11Google Scholar
Oberhauser, R., Pogolski, C. and Matic, A. (2018), “VR-BPMN: Visualizing BPMN Models in Virtual Reality”, in Shishkov, B. (Ed.), Business Modeling and Software Design: 8th International Symposium, BMSD 2018, Vienna, Austria, July 2-4, 2018, Proceedings, Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, Vol. 319, Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94214-8_6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ovtcharova, J. (2010), “Virtual Engineering: Principles, Methods and Applications”, in Marjanović, D. (Ed.), Design 2010: Proceedings of the 11th International Design Conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 17-20 May 2010, Design Society, pp. 1267–1274.Google Scholar
Poppe, E. et al. (2011), “A prototype augmented reality collaborative process modelling tool”, in Rinderle-Ma, S., Toumani, F. and Wolf, K. (Eds.), Business process management: 9th international conference (BPM 2011), Clermont-Ferrand, France, 28 August-2 September 2011, Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, C.S.C. et al. (2016), “VisAr3D: An Innovative 3D Visualization of UML Models”, in Dillon, L., Visser, W. and Williams, L. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Software Engineering Companion - ICSE ‘16, Austin, Texas, 14 May 2016-22 May 2016, ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, pp. 451–460. https://doi.org/10.1145/2889160.2889199Google Scholar
Stark, J. (2015), Product Lifecycle Management: Volume 1: 21st Century Paradigm for Product Realisation, Decision Engineering, 3rd ed., Springer International Publishing, Cham.Google Scholar
Stark, R. et al. (2009), “Smart Hybrid Prototyping zur multimodalen Erlebbarkeit virtueller Prototypen innerhalb der Produktentstehung”, in Lichtenstein, A. (Ed.), Der Mensch im Mittelpunkt technischer Systeme: 8. Berliner Werkstatt Mensch-Maschine-Systeme, Berlin, 7-9 October 2009, VDI-Verlag, Düsseldorf.Google Scholar
VDI (2004), VDI 2206 - Design methodology for mechatronic systems No. 2206, Verein Deutscher Ingenieure, Düsseldorf, available at: www.vdi.de.Google Scholar
VDI (2018), VDI 2221 Entwicklung technischer Produkte und Systeme - Modell der Produktentwicklung No. VDI 2221, Verein Deutscher Ingenieure, Düsseldorf.Google Scholar
Völter, M. et al. (2013), Model-Driven Software Development: Technology, Engineering, Management, Wiley Software Patterns Series, Wiley.Google Scholar
Weilkiens, T. (2008), Systems Engineering with SysML/UML: Modeling, Analysis, Design, The MK / OMG Press, 1. Aufl., Elsevier professional, s.l.Google Scholar
Zhang, B. and Chen, Y.-S. (2005), “Enhancing UML Conceptual Modeling through the Use of Virtual Reality”, in Sprague, R.H. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Big Island, HI, USA, 3-6 January 2005, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, California.Google Scholar