Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T16:19:08.438Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Testing quantitative genetic selection theory with the mouse: A review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2017

E. J. Eisen
E. J. Eisen*
Affiliation:
Animal Science Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access

Extract

The theory of quantitative genetics is used to predict certain outcomes in a dynamic population undergoing selection. The goal of this review is to demonstrate the value of the mouse as a model to test quantitative genetic selection theory.

Heritablity estimates in a base population are used to predict selection response. How good is this prediction? Sheridan (1988) reported discrepancies between predicted and realized heritabilities in selection experiments with laboratory and farm animals. An updated summary of single-trait selection experiments for different traits in mice indicates good agreement between predicted and realized heritabilities (r = 0.81, P < 0.01), with no suggestion of upward or downward bias in the base estimates (Eisen, 2005).

Type
Invited Papers
Information
Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science , Volume 2005 , 2005 , pp. 238
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bulmer, M. G. 1971. The effect of selection on genetic variability. Am. Nat. 105: 201–211.Google Scholar
Eisen, E. J. 2005. Testing quantitative genetic selection theory. In: The Mouse in Animal Genetics and Breeding Reseach. ed. Eisen, E. J.. Imperial College Press, London (In press).Google Scholar
Falconer, D. S. 1973. Replicated selection for body weight in mice. Genet. Res. 22: 291–321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, W. G. 1972. Estimation of realized heritabilities for selection experiments. I. Divergent selection. Biometrics 28: 747–765 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheridan, A. K. 1988. Agreement between estimated and realized genetic parameters. Anim. Br. Abst. 56: 877–889.Google Scholar