Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T21:50:39.498Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of artichoke (Cynara scolymus) by-product using the semi-automatic In vitro gas production technique

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2017

Sobhy Mohamed Abdallah Sallam ,
Ives Claudio da Silva Bueno ,
Patricia Barboza Godoy ,
Eduardo Fernando Nozella ,
Adibe Luiz Abdalla  and
Dorrina Miriam Silber Schmidt Vitti
Sobhy Mohamed Abdallah Sallam*
Affiliation:
Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
Ives Claudio da Silva Bueno
Affiliation:
Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
Patricia Barboza Godoy
Affiliation:
Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
Eduardo Fernando Nozella
Affiliation:
Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
Adibe Luiz Abdalla
Affiliation:
Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
Dorrina Miriam Silber Schmidt Vitti
Affiliation:
Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
*
Email:[email protected]
Get access

Extract

The major constraint limiting the development of livestock production in many developing countries is inadequacy of animal feed; although there are a wide range of valuable by-products and residues eligible to complement it. To estimate whether a material is appropriate for animal feeding, in vitro gas production (GP) technique have been used to evaluate the potential of different classes of feedstuffs to supply nutrients to ruminants. Thus, the fermentation characteristics of artichoke by-product (Cynara scolymus), alfalfa and Tifton 85 (Cynodon sp) hay were evaluated by in vitro GP technique.

Type
Poster Presentations
Information
Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science , Volume 2007 , April 2007 , pp. 208
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AOAC, 1995. Official Methods of Analysis, 15th ed Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Blummel, M., Makkar, H. P. S. & Becker, K. 1997. In vitro gas production: a technique revisited. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 77: 24–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueno, I.C.S, Filho, S.L.S., Gobbo, S.P, Louvandini, H., Vitti, D.M.S.S., Abdalla, A.L., 2005. Influence of inoculum source in a gas production method. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 123-124: 95–105.Google Scholar
Makkar, H.P.S., Blummel, M., Borowy, N.K., Becker, K. 1993. Gravimetric determination of tannins and their correlations with chemical and protein precipitation methods. J. Sci. Food Agric. 61: 161–165.Google Scholar
Van Gelder, M.H., Rodrigues, M.A.M, De Boever, J.L., Den Hartigh, H., Rymer, C., van Oostrum, M., van Kaathoven, R., Cone, J.W., 2005. Ranking of in vitro fermentability of 20 feedstuffs with an automated gas production technique: Results of a ring test. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 123-124: 243–253.Google Scholar
Van Soest, P.J., Robertson, J.B., Lewis, B.A., 1991. Methods of dietary fibre, neutral detergent fibre and non-starch polysaccharides (NSP) in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 74:3583–3597.Google Scholar