Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:27:08.580Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Estimating meal criteria for meal pattern analysis of dairy cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2017

B J Tolkamp
Affiliation:
Animal Biology Division, Scottish Agricultural College, and BioSS*, The King's Buildings, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, UK
D J Allcroft
Affiliation:
Animal Biology Division, Scottish Agricultural College, and BioSS*, The King's Buildings, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, UK
I Kyriazakis
Affiliation:
Animal Biology Division, Scottish Agricultural College, and BioSS*, The King's Buildings, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, UK
Get access

Extract

Meal pattern analyses depend crucially on appropriate estimates of bout or meal criteria (i.e., the longest non-feeding intervals accepted as part of a meal). Bout criteria are frequently estimated after fitting a ‘broken-stick’ to the un-transformed, the log-transformed, or the log-transformed cumulative (log-survivorship), frequency distribution of between-feeding interval length. We know of no biological justification for fitting a broken stick to the frequency distribution of short intervals between feeding events and can, therefore, not interpret ‘criteria’ obtained that way. The methods that fit a broken-stick to log-survivorship or log-frequency curves are based on the implicit assumption that the probability of an animal initiating a bout is independent of the time since the last bout. Only then will the length of intervals between bouts be distributed as a negative exponential that appears as a straight line after log-transformation. However, the satiety concept predicts that this probability is not constant but increases with time since the last meal.

Type
Programme
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Tolkamp, B.J., Allcroft, D.J., Austin, E.J., Nielsen, B.L. & Kyriazakis, I. 1998. Satiety splits feeding behaviour into bouts. Journal of Theoretical Biology 194: 235250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed