Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T01:51:09.686Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of mild early-and mid-pregnancy under-nutrition on foetal and placental development in Scottish Blackface and Suffolk sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 November 2017

M Werkman
Affiliation:
SAC, Edinburgh, United Kingdom Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen, Netherlands
J A Rooke
Affiliation:
SAC, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
K McIlvaney
Affiliation:
SAC, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
C M Dwyer
Affiliation:
SAC, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
C J Ashworth*
Affiliation:
SAC, Edinburgh, United Kingdom University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Get access

Extract

Nutrient intake during pregnancy affects foetal development and placental function in a range of species, often with long-term effects on offspring viability. Maternal nutrient supply is believed to affect the ability of the placenta to deliver nutrients to the foetus (Fowden et al., 2006). In ruminant species, the majority of placental nutrient transport occurs in specialised structures called placentomes, which are categorised into 4 types (A-D) based on their morphological appearance. In type A placentomes, maternal tissue surrounds foetal tissues, whereas type D placentomes are typically everted and have a higher ratio of foetal:maternal tissue. It has been suggested that the distribution of placentome types may reflect the ability of the placenta to deliver nutrients (Vonnahme et al., 2006). This study tested the hypothesis that levels of under-nutrition typically encountered by hill ewes during pregnancy would alter the distribution of placentome types and that the relationship between ewe nutrition and placentome type would differ between breeds selected for lean tissue growth (such as the Suffolk) compared to less selected breeds (such as the Scottish Blackface).

Type
Theatre Presentations
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Fowden, A.L., Ward, J.W., Wooding, F.P.B., Forhead, A.J. and Constancia, M. 2006. Journal of Physiology. 572, 5–15.Google Scholar
Vatnick, I., Schoknecht, P.A., Darrigrand, R. and Bell, A.W. 1991. Journal of Developmental Physiology. 15, 351–356.Google Scholar
Vonnahme, K.A., Hess, B.W., Nijland, M.J., Nathanielsz, P.N. and Ford, S.P. 2006. Journal of Animal Science 84. 3451–3459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar