Hostname: page-component-55f67697df-bzg56 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-09T02:32:46.630Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of forage: concentrate ratio on meat quality of bulls slaughtered at a range of liveweights

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2017

F.O. Lively ,
T.W.J. Keady ,
L.E.R. Dawson ,
B.W. Moss  and
D.J. Kilpatrick
F.O. Lively*
Affiliation:
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, NI, United Kingdom
T.W.J. Keady
Affiliation:
Teagasc, Athenry, Ireland
L.E.R. Dawson
Affiliation:
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, NI, United Kingdom
B.W. Moss
Affiliation:
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, NI, United Kingdom
D.J. Kilpatrick
Affiliation:
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, NI, United Kingdom
*
Email:[email protected]
Get access

Extract

The current upward trend in cereal prices will have a negative impact on the economics of intensive beef finishing systems. Patterson et al (1994) concluded that continental bulls could perform at a high level on diets which were relatively low in concentrates and predominantly based on grass silage. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effect of forage:concentrate ratio and weight at slaughter on the meat quality of ¾ or more continental bulls.

Type
Theatre Presentations
Information
Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science , Volume 2008 , 2008 , pp. 51
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Dawson, L.E.R and Lively, F.O. 2007. Proceedings of the Suckler Cow Workers Group MeetingGoogle Scholar
Keady, T.W.J and Kilpatrick, D.J. 2006. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science, p50 Google Scholar
Patterson, D.C., Moore, C.A. and Steen, R.W.J. 1994. Animal Production 58, p 41–47 Google Scholar