Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:28:24.799Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison of calorimetry and comparative slaughter for estimating energy retention and kf by young steers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2017

R Sanderson ,
M S Dhanoa ,
C Thomas  and
D E Beever
R Sanderson
Affiliation:
IGER, Plas Gogerddan, Aberystwyth, Dyfed, UK SY23 3EB
M S Dhanoa
Affiliation:
IGER, Plas Gogerddan, Aberystwyth, Dyfed, UK SY23 3EB
C Thomas
Affiliation:
SAC, Auchincruive, Ayr, UK KA6 5HW
D E Beever
Affiliation:
CEDAR, Department of Agriculture, University of Reading, Reading, Berkshire, UK RG6 2AT
Get access

Extract

Where indirect calorimetry and slaughter techniques have been compared previously (eg: Geay, 1984; Beever et al, 1988) estimates of energy retention have tended to be greater from calorimetry than from slaughter studies. However, in most instances each technique was applied to a different group of animal and over only a limited range in energy retention. The aim of this work was to examine the difference between estimates of energy retention obtained using a direct technique (comparative slaughter) (ERs) and an indirect technique (open circuit respiration calorimetry) (ERc) applied to the same group of animals and over a relatively wide range of energy retentions.

Type
Cattle Nutrition & Production
Information
Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science , Volume 1995 , March 1995 , pp. 146
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barker, Soh and Evans, (1988) Biometrics 44: 279–281 10.2307/2531917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beever, et al (1988) British Journal of Nutrition 60: 307–319.10.1079/BJN19880102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brouwer, (1965) EAAP Publ. N°. 11, pp.441–443.Google Scholar
Geay, (1984) Journal of Animal Science 58: 766–778.10.2527/jas1984.583766xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lonsdale, (1976) PhD thesis, University of Reading, UK.Google Scholar