Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T16:16:23.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interactive effect of sodium bentonite with pigment on performance and egg quality of laying hens from 36-48 weeks of age

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2017

H. Hashemipour ,
H. Kermanshahi ,
A.g. Golian  and
H. Nassiri Moghaddam
H. Hashemipour*
Affiliation:
Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Khorasan razavi, Islamic Republic of Iran
H. Kermanshahi
Affiliation:
Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Khorasan razavi, Islamic Republic of Iran
A.g. Golian
Affiliation:
Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Khorasan razavi, Islamic Republic of Iran
H. Nassiri Moghaddam
Affiliation:
Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Khorasan razavi, Islamic Republic of Iran
*
Email:[email protected]
Get access

Extract

Sodium bentonite (SB) has been widely used in poultry industry as agent that binds mycotoxine, moisture and ammonia. SB supplementation has generally been used in animal diets for reasons other than the nutrients they supply. 3% SB in cattle rations reported no significant influence on rate of gain, feed efficiency or hepatic vitamin A and carotene retention (Erwin, Elam and Dyer, 1957). Adding 2% of SB resulted in an improved egg production of 11% in laying hens. SB improves feed efficiency, laying frequency, shell quality and egg size and also reduce moisture of the excreta of Leghorn hens (Quisenberry and Bradley, 1964). This experiment was conducted to determine the effect of SB and a synthetic pigment containing lucantin® yellow and xanthin on performance and egg quality of laying hens.

Type
Posters
Information
Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science , Volume 2008 , 2008 , pp. 260
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kurnick, A.A., and Reid, B.L. 1960. Feedstuffs 26, 75.Google Scholar
Olver, M.D., British Poultry Science. 1989: 36: 115–121.Google Scholar
Quisenberry, J. H., and Bradley, J. W. 1964. Feedstuffs 36, 22–23.Google Scholar
Erwin, E.S., Elam, C.J., and Dyer, I.A. 1957. Animal science 16, 858.Google Scholar