Hostname: page-component-669899f699-b58lm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-29T13:39:31.194Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of a set of hierarchically ordered feed descriptors as predictors of milk protein concentration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2021

A. J. Rook ,
E. Smoler ,
D. E. Beever ,
M. A. Lomax  and
J. D. Sutton
A. J. Rook
Affiliation:
Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, North Wyke, Okehampton, Devon EX20 2SB, United Kingdom
E. Smoler
Affiliation:
University of Reading, Earley Gate, Reading RG6 6AT, United Kingdom
D. E. Beever
Affiliation:
University of Reading, Earley Gate, Reading RG6 6AT, United Kingdom
M. A. Lomax
Affiliation:
University of Reading, Earley Gate, Reading RG6 6AT, United Kingdom
J. D. Sutton
Affiliation:
University of Reading, Earley Gate, Reading RG6 6AT, United Kingdom
Get access

Extract

Recent changes in the structure of the UK dairy industry are leading to closer specification of milk protein concentration (MPC) by customers. Accurate prediction of MPC from feed input variables is needed to allow producers to meet this demand. Previous attempts to predict MPC have been relatively unsuccessful (e.g. Rook et al., 1992). However, recent advances in feed description such as the AFRC (1993) protein system may allow further progress.

Type
Dairy
Information
Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science , Volume 1996 , March 1996 , pp. 86
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Agriculture and Food Research Council, 1993. Energy and protein requirements of ruminants. CAB International, Wallingford.Google Scholar
Hoerl, A.E. and Kennard, R.W. 1970. Ridge regression: biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems. Technometrics 12:55–67.10.1080/00401706.1970.10488634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phipps, R.H., Sutton, J.D and Jones, B.A. 1993. Study of mixed forage diets for dairy cows for the Milk Marketing Board of England and Wales. Report No. 9. CEDAR, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Rook, A. J., Sutton, J. D. and France, J. 1992. Prediction of the yields of milk constituents in dairy cows offered silage ad-libitum and concentrates at a flat rate. Animal Production 54:313–322.Google Scholar