Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T10:45:28.618Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An analysis of the variation between dairy-sire progeny-groups for milk yield and fat content

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 May 2016

Alan Robertson  and
S. S. Khishin
Alan Robertson
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Genetics, Edinburgh
S. S. Khishin
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Genetics, Edinburgh
Get access

Extract

The past few years have seen the development in Great Britain of the ‘contemporary comparison’ method for evaluating progeny tests of dairy sires (Macarthur, 1954; Robertson, Stewart and Ashton 1956). The final overall figure attached to a sire is the mean difference between the yield of his daughters and that of other heifers milking in the same herd in the same year, with due regard for the numbers of animals in the two groups. Although it has some imperfections in special cases, this is probably the most informative simple method of evaluating a sire for yield and, fortunately, one which could be easily integrated with the existing recording system. The method has been turned into a simple routine in the Bureau of Records of the Milk Marketing Board and several thousand bulls have now been evaluated. In this paper, we shall be mostly concerned to use this material to investigate the heritabilities of milk yield and fat content and the relationship between the two in the different breeds. The information that we shall use consists, for each bull, of the mean contemporary comparison, with its effective ‘weight’, and the average fat percentage of the daughters. Before we deal with the observed results, we should go into rather more detail into the nature of these two figures and into the factors affecting them.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Production , Volume 1958 , 1958 , pp. 19 - 29
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Production 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Farthing, H. W., & Legates, J. E., 1957. J.Dairy Sci., 40: 639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickman, C. G., & Henderson, C. R., 1955. Components of the relationship between level of production and rate of maturity in dairy cattle.J.Dairy Sci., 38: 883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legates, J. E., Verlinden, F. J., & Kendrick, J. F., 1956. Sire by herd interaction in production traits in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci., 39: 1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McArthur, A. T. G., 1954. The assessment of progeny tests of dairy bulls made under farm conditions.Proc. Brit. Soc. Anim. Prod., 1954: 75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milk marketing board, 1956. Progeny recorded bulls with contemporary comparisons, 1st list.Thames Ditton, M.M.B. Google Scholar
Rendel, J. M., Robertson, Alan, Asker, A. A., Khishin, S. S., & Ragab, M. T., 1957. The inheritance of milk production characteristics.J.agric. Sci., 48: 426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, Alan, & Rendel, J. M., 1954. The performance of heifers got by artificial insemination.agric. Sci., 44: 184.Google Scholar
Robertson, Alan, Stewart, A., & Ashton, E. D., 1956. The progeny assessment of dairy sires for milk: the use of contemporary comparisons. Proc. Brit. Soc. Anim. Prod., 1956: 43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar