Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T10:47:38.170Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Progeny Testing of Welsh Mountain Sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 May 2016

G. L. Williams
G. L. Williams*
Affiliation:
University College of North Wales, Bangor
Get access

Extract

The progeny test is generally regarded as an important aid to selection in livestock improvement. It is by no means a new method, but it seems to be in the limelight today. The usual methods of selection have brought us to a certain standard of performance, and apparently any further imporvement can only result through the application of the progeny test.

It is worth pointing out that cattle, especially dairy cattle, pigs and poultry have received more attention by the scientist than sheep. This may be due to the fact that these animals are more under the direct control of the breeder than sheep. They require daily attention whereas a hill flock of sheep may not be seen for weeks or months by the breeder. Again one has definite objectives in view when breeding dairy cows or hens; one can weigh the milk and count the eggs but the task of the hill sheep worker is considerably more complicated.

Type
Progeny Testing
Information
Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Production , Volume 1953 , Issue 2: Eighteenth Meeting , March 1953 , pp. 51 - 60
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Production 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dickerson, G. E., and Hazel, L. N. 1944. Effectiveness of selection on progeny performance as a supplement to earlier culling in livestock. J. agric. Res.,69 : 459.Google Scholar
Fraser, A. S., and Hamada, M. K. O. 1952. Observations on the birthcoats and skins of several breeds and crosses of British sheep. Proc. roy. Soc. Edinb., B, 64 : 462.Google Scholar
Goot, H. 1946. A note on progeny testing. Proportion of rams which can be progeny tested in New Zealand Romney Marsh stud flocks. N.Z. J. Sci. Tech., Agric, 28: 218.Google Scholar
Johansson, I., and Robertson, A. 1953. Progeny testing in the breeding of farm animals. Proc. Brit. Soc. Anim. Prod. 17th Meet. 1952 : 79.Google Scholar
Mcmahon, P. R. [1946.] Some notes on the inheritance of productivity in sheep. Proc. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod., 6th Ann. Conf. 1946 : 80.Google Scholar
Morley, F. H. W. 1952. Selection for economic characters in Australian Merino Sheep. II. Relative efficiency of certain aids to selection. Aust. J. agric. Res., 3: 409.Google Scholar
Rae, A. L. 1950. Genetic variation and covariation in productive characters of New Zealand Romney Marsh sheep. Doct. Thesis, Iowa State Coll., Ames. Abstract in Iowa St. Coll. J. Sci., 1952. 26 :268.Google Scholar
Sinclair, A. N. 1950. Progeny testing methods in sheep. Agric. Gaz. N.S.W., 61 :530; 577.Google Scholar
Stevens, P. G. 1949. The merit sire test of the Corriedale Sheep Society (Incorporated). Tech. Publ. Lincoln Coll. (Canterbury agric. Coll.), No. 3 : 24 pp.Google Scholar