Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T10:53:01.068Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Assessment of Progeny Tests of Dairy Bulls made under Farm Conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 May 2016

A. T. G. McArthur
A. T. G. McArthur*
Affiliation:
Bureau of Records, Milk Marketing Board of England and Wales
Get access

Extract

The main object of the artificial insemination service is herd improvement. This is facilitated by the larger selection differential obtained when only a small number of bulls are used. Robertson and Rendel (1954) have shown that artificially bred daughters by bulls used at centres outwith the Milk Marketing Board system did not outyield naturally bred daughters milking in the same herds and these results have been substantiated by data from the Board’s centres. This failure to select bulls better than those used in the average herd has probably been due to the multiple aims of selection necessary to satisfy all those interested in the artificial breeding movement and to the methods which have been used to evaluate bulls. A method has been designed aimed at improving this evaluation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Production , Volume 1954 , 1954 , pp. 75 - 82
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Production 1954

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anonymous, 1953. Ladugarden, June 1953.Google Scholar
Hancock, J., 1952. Ten Waikato herds after 10 years of artificial breeding. Proceedings of the Ruakura Farmers’ Conference Week, Hamilton, New Zealand, 1952. Wellington: Department of Agriculture, New Zealand. P. 168.Google Scholar
Johansson, I., & Robertson, A., 1953. Progeny testing in the breeding of farm animals. Proc. Brit. Soc. Anim. Prod., 1952 : 79.Google Scholar
Korkman, N., 1953. Versuch einer vergleichenden Nachkommenschaftsunter-suchung von Bullen, die in Herden mit verschieden starker Fütterung wirken. Z. Tierz. ZüchtBiol., 61 : 375.Google Scholar
Lush, J. L., 1945. Animal breeding plans. Ames: Iowa State College Press. 3rd ed. viii + 443 pp.Google Scholar
Patow, C. Von., , 1930. Weitere Studien iiber die Vererbung der Milchleistung beim Rinde. Z. Zücht., B, 17 : 3.Google Scholar
Robertson, A., 1953. Private communication.Google Scholar
Robertson, A., & Asker, A. A., 1951. The genetic history and breed structure of British Friesian cattle. Emp. J. exp. Agric., 19 : 113.Google Scholar
Robertson, A., & Rendel, J. M., 1950. The use of progeny testing with artificial insemination in dairy cattle. J. Genet., 50 : 21.Google Scholar
Robertson, A., & Rendel, J. M., 1954. The performance of heifers got by artificial insemination. J. agric. Sci., 44 : 184.Google Scholar
Stewart, A., 1952. The expansion and structure of the New Zealand pedigree Jersey breed. Proc. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod., 12 : 32.Google Scholar
Ward, A. H., 1947. Dairy herd testing in New Zealand. 23rd Rep. N.Z. Dairy Bd : 25.Google Scholar
Ward, A. H., 1950. Dairy herd testing in New Zealand. 26th Rep. N.Z. Dairy Bd : 45.Google Scholar