Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T03:35:00.727Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Subclinical mastitis in problem herds in Scotland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2017

D N Logue
Affiliation:
Dairy Herd Health Unit, SAC Vet Services, Auchincruive, Ayr KA6 5HW
J Gunn
Affiliation:
Dairy Herd Health Unit, SAC Vet Services, Auchincruive, Ayr KA6 5HW
D Fenlon
Affiliation:
SAC Aberdeen and D Arnot, SAC Auchincruive, Ayr
Get access

Extract

The recent introduction of penalties and premiums for bulk tank somatic cell counts (BTSCC) following the EC Directive of 5th August 1985 (no L 226/13) and subsequent EC Regulation of the 5th February 1990 (no COM(89)667) has reinforced the need for a greater awareness of the factors involved in herds with high BTSCC figures and their rapid identification. In the past a number of surveys have been conducted examining the major causes of mastitis in a cross section of the national herd (Wilson & Richards 1980) and these have demonstrated the importance of subclinical mastitis and in particular the so-called ‘cow-side organisms’, however more recently the impact of acute environmental mastitis has been of greater concern (Wilesmith Francis & Wilson 1986). Thus a reappraisal of priorities has become necessary, not least because these E C Regulations allow the sale of unpasteurised milk and milk products.

Type
Dairy Production
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Production 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anon (1990). Scottish Veterinary Investigation Service Annual Report 1990.Google Scholar
Griffin, T K, Morant, S V & Dodd, D F (1987). Bulletin of the International Dairy Federation No. 211, 916.Google Scholar
International Dairy Federation (1981). IDF Document 132.Google Scholar
Neave, F K, Dodd, F H & Kingwill, R G (1966). Veterinary Record 78, 521523.Google Scholar
Wilesmith, J W, Francis, P G & Wilson, C D (1986). Veterinary Record 118, 199204.Google Scholar
Wilson, C D & Richards, M S (1980). Veterinary Record 106, 431435.Google Scholar