Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T03:30:58.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sow housing, behaviour and productivity are related to opioid receptor densities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2017

A.J. Zanella
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Cambridge University, Madingley Rd. CB30ES, U.K.
D.M. Broom
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Cambridge University, Madingley Rd. CB30ES, U.K.
J.C. Hunter
Affiliation:
Parke-Davis Neuroscience Research Centre, Addenbrooks Hospital Site, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2QB, U.K.
Get access

Extract

Stereotypies such as bar-biting and sham-chewing, inactivity and unresponsiveness are behavioural responses to confinement in pigs. A link between stereotypies and opioids in sows, has been established by Cronin et al.,(1986) who found that the opioid antagonist naloxone inhibited some stereotypies. Stereotypies exhibited different degrees of resistance to the disruption by naloxone, in Cronin's experiment. Modulation of opioid receptors can be influenced by chronic treatment with opioid agonists and antagonists (Blanchard, and Chang,1988). Similarly, opioid receptors can be up or down-regulated by stressful stimuli such as restraint, electric footshock or social isolation (Zeman et al., 1988). In the study reported here mu, delta and kappa receptor densities and affinity were measured post-mortem. A comparison was made between sows which had been tethered or group-housed on commercial farms. The receptor densities were also compared with the behaviour which tethered sows had shown during the latter stages of pregnancy, as well as with their reproductive peformance.

Type
Pig Welfare and Behaviour
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Production 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bechara, A. and Van Der Kooy, D. (1987). Pharmachology Biochemistry & Behaviour. 28 : 227233 Google Scholar
Blanchard, S.G. and Chang, K.J. (1988) In:The Opiate Receptors: 430439. Ed. G.W., Pasternak The Humana Press/Clifton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Cronin, G.M. Wiepkema, P.R. and Van Ree, J.M. (1986) Experientia 42: 198199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, J.C.; Birchmore, B.; Woodruff, R.; Hughes, J.. (1989) Neuroscience. 31: 735743 Google Scholar
Kraeling, R.R. and Barb, C.R. (1990) J. Reprod. Fert. (40): 317 Google Scholar
Zeman, P.; Alexandrova, M.; Kvetnansky, R. (1988) Endocrinol. Exp. (Bratisl) 22: 5966 Google Scholar