Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:08:28.495Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Relationship between sires transmitting ability and daughter performance in a high yielding dairy herd

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2017

P Persaud
Affiliation:
Edinburgh School of Agriculture West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG
G Simm
Affiliation:
Edinburgh School of Agriculture West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG
H Parkinson
Affiliation:
Edinburgh School of Agriculture West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG
W G Hill
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Genetics University of Edinburgh, King’s Buildings, West Mains Road, Edinburgh
Get access

Extract

In the UK feed accounts for 0.80 to 0.90 of the variable costs of dairy production. In recent years the imposition of milk quotas has served to emphasise the importance of efficient milk and milk solids production. In field progeny testing schemes, sires’ transmitting ability or breeding value can be predicted for milk production traits, but not for feed Intake or for efficiency of milk production. As breeders continue to select on production traits, using sires of high genetic merit for production, the important question then is, ‘what correlated response occurs in gross efficiency and in feed consumption?’.

Type
Animal Breeding
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Production 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Broadbent, P.J., McIntosh, J.A.R. and Spence, A. 1970. The evaluation of a device for feeding group-housed animals individually. Animal Production. 12: 245252.Google Scholar
Cunningham, J.J.P. 1984. Efficiency of milk production In a high yielding dairy herd and Its relationship to llvewelght and condition score changes. MSc Thesis, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Meyer, K. 1988. DFREML-Programs to estimate variance components for individual animal models by restricted maximum likelihood (REML). User Notes. University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Milk Marketing Board. 1979. The Improved contemporary comparison. Report of the Breeding and Production Organisation, Milk Marketing Board. No. 29: 9195.Google Scholar
Tyrell, H.F. and Reid, J.T. 1965. Prediction of the energy value of cow’s milk. J. Dairy Scl., 43: 12151223.Google Scholar