Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T21:20:18.047Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of level of feeding after mating on ‘fat’ and ‘thin’ sows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 November 2017

N. Walker*
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down. BT26 6DP
Get access

Extract

Pregnant sows in poor body condition require a high feed intake to restore body fat reserves. However, a high intake in the period following conception may increase embryo losses. The first objective of this experiment was to determine whether a high feed allowance after conception has any effect on litter size compared with a normal allowance. The second objective was to investigate the effects of body condition at conception and feed rate in early pregnancy on the components of maternal gain.

Multiparous cross-bred sows of Large White and Landrace lineage were classified subjectively at farrowing according to body condition as either fat (F) or thin (T). A single diet containing 12.5 MJ DE/kg and 150 g CP/kg was fed throughout the experiment. The fat sows were fed more generously than the thin sows during the 28 day lactation with mean intakes of 5.3 and 4.8 kg/day. This was to maintain the differential in body condition between the two groups. After weaning all sows were fed 3 kg per day until mating. Within the fat and thin groups sows were allocated at random to either 4 or 2 kg of feed per day for 30 days after mating.

Type
Pig Production
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Production 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Williams, I.H., Close, W.H. and Cole, D.J.A. (1985). Strategies for sow nutrition: predicting the response of pregnant animals to protein and energy intake. In ‘Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition - 1985' pp. 133147. Ed. Haresign, W. and Cole, D.J.A.. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar