Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-07T07:59:27.827Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Lysine/DE Ratio on Growth Performance and Nitrogen Deposition of Hybrid Boars, Gilts and Castrates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2017

T.A. Van Lunen  and
D.J.A. Cole
T.A. Van Lunen
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture and Food Science, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, Leicestershire, LE12 5RD
D.J.A. Cole
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture and Food Science, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, Leicestershire, LE12 5RD
Get access

Extract

With the development of pig genotypes having high N deposition rates, previously accepted nutrient requirement recommendations must be re-examined. Requirements for protein (assuming lysine represents ‘ideal’ protein) for conventional growing pigs have been in the range of .60 to .74 g lysine/MJ DE (Batterham, 1994) while recent work with hybrid boars has shown a positive growth and N deposition response to ratios of the order of 1.0 (Rao and McCracken, 1991). It is generally accepted that sex has an effect on N deposition rate (Campbell et al., 1990) and therefore possibly on nutrient requirements. There is little information available on the effect of sex on growth and N deposition rate of modern genotypes. This experiment was conducted to estimate the N deposition rate of highly selected boars, gilts and castrates from 25 to 90 kg liveweight when fed diets containing ratios from 0.4 to 1.4 g lysine/MJ DE.

Type
PIG Feeding and Nutrition
Information
Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Production (1972) , Volume 1994 , March 1994 , pp. 32
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Production 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Batterham, E.S. 1994. Protein and energy relationships for growing pigs. Principles of Pig Science, pp 107–121. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham.Google Scholar
Campbell, R.G., Johnson, R.J., King, R.H. and Taverner, M.R. 1990. Effects of gender and genotype on the response of growing pigs to exogenous administration of porcine growth hormone. J. Anim. Sci. 68:2674–2681.Google Scholar
Chadd, S.A., Cole, D.J.A. and Walters, J.R. 1993. The food intake, performance and carcass characteristics of two pig genotypes grown to 120 kg live weight. Anim. Prod. 57:473–481.Google Scholar
Rao, D.S. and McCracken, K.J. 1991. Effects of energy intake on protein and energy metabolism of boars of high genetic potential for lean growth. Anim. Prod. 52:499–507.Google Scholar
Van Lunen, T.A. and Cole, D.J.A. 1993. Protein deposition rate of hybrid boars and its measurement. Anim. Prod. 56:421 (Abst).Google Scholar