Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T22:56:45.681Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparative study of rumen activity in churra and merino sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2017

M.D. Carro
Affiliation:
Departamento de Producción Animal I, Universidad de León, 24007 LEON, SPAIN.
F.J. Giráldez
Affiliation:
Departamento de Producción Animal I, Universidad de León, 24007 LEON, SPAIN.
M.J. Ranilla
Affiliation:
Departamento de Producción Animal I, Universidad de León, 24007 LEON, SPAIN.
J.S. González
Affiliation:
Departamento de Producción Animal I, Universidad de León, 24007 LEON, SPAIN.
A.R. Mantecón
Affiliation:
EAE-CSIC, Aptdo. 788. 24080 LEON, SPAIN.
Get access

Extract

Some recent studies (Frutos et al., 1992) comparing Spanish sheep breeds have indicate possible differences between breeds in the digestive diet utilization. The aim of this experiment was to compare the activity of microbies in the rumens of Churra and Merino sheep which were kept in the same environment and received the same diets. The pH and ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N) concentration in rumen liquor were also determined in all animals.

The experiment was conducted with 5 mature Churra sheep (47.2 ± 2.74 kg live weight (LW)) and 5 mature Merino sheep (45.0 ± 0.91 kg LW), which had been fitted with a rumen cannula of 35 mm diameter 4 months before the start of the experiment. All animals were housed in individual pens and had free access to water and mineral blocks. The animals received alfalfa hay at maintenance level through the experimental period, which was distributed in two equal amounts at 10:00 and 18:00 h.

Type
Ruminant Metabolism
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Production 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Frutos, P., Revesado, P.R., Mantecón, A.R., González, J.S. and Carro, M.D., 1992. Proc. Symposium de nutrition humaine et animale. Vol. 6, NQ 3: 173–174.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E.R., and McDonald, I., 1979. J. Agric. Sci., Camb.,92: 499#x2013;503.Google Scholar
McDonald, I., 1981. J. Agric. Sci., Camb., 96: 251–252.Google Scholar
Mehrez, A.Z. and Ørskov, E.R., 1977. J. Agric. Sci., Camb., 88: 645–650.Google Scholar
Statistical Analysis System Institute. 1985. User's Guide: Statistics. SAS Inst. (Editor), Cary, NC.Google Scholar