Hostname: page-component-669899f699-7xsfk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-27T15:31:24.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Anatomical aspects of growth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

R. M. Butterfield  and
R. T. Berg
R. M. Butterfield
Affiliation:
University of Sydney, Australia
R. T. Berg
Affiliation:
University of Alberta, Canada
Get access

Extract

Under this very broad title we have selected three aspects of current and recent work which have a bearing on our understanding of the interpretation of findings dealing with muscle-weight distribution. The first is a justification of the anatomical approach, the second a confirmation of, and elaboration on, some earlier work, and the third a suggestion for some future thinking.

Type
54th Meeting, Coventry, 27 to 29 March 1972 Symposium: Aspects of Carcass Evaluation
Information
Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Production (1972) , Volume 1 , January 1972 , pp. 109 - 112
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Production 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Berg, R. T. and Mukhoty, H. 1970. Lean distribution in carcasses from bulls, steers and heifers of various breeds. 49th A. Feeders' Day Rep., Dept. Anim. Sci., Univ. Alberta, pp. 40–41.Google Scholar
Brännäng, E. 1966. Studies on monozygous cattle twins. XVIII. The effect of castration and age of castration on the growth rate, feed conversion and carcase traits of Swedish Red and White cattle. Pt. I. LantbrHögsk. Annlr 32: 329–415.Google Scholar
Brännäng, E. 1971. Studies on monozygous cattle twins. XXIII. The effect of castration and age of castration on the development of single muscles, bones and special sex characters. Pt. II. Swed. J. agric. Res. 1: 69–78.Google Scholar
Butterfield, R. M. 1963. Relative growth of the musculature of the ox. In Symposium on Carcase Composition and Appraisal of Meat Animals (ed. Tribe, D. E.), pp. 7–1 to 7–14. CSIRO, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Butterfield, R. M. and Berg, R. T. 1966a. A nutritional effect on relative growth of muscles. Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. 4: 298–304.Google Scholar
Butterfield, R. M. and Berg, R. T. 1966b. A classification of bovine muscles based on their relative growth patterns. Res. vet. Sci. 7: 326–332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butterfield, R. M. and Johnson, E. R. 1971. A study of growth in calves. II. Relative growth in muscles. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 76: 457–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, V. R. 1968. Body development and some problems of its evaluation. In Growth and Development of Mammals (ed. Lodge, G. A. and Lamming, G. E.), pp. 195–211. Butterworth, London.Google Scholar
Johnson, E. R., Pryor, W. J. and Butterfield, R. M. 1972. Studies of fat distribution in the Bovine carcase. II. Relationship of intramuscular fat to the quantitative analysis of the skeletal musculature. Aust. J. agric. Res. (In press).Google Scholar
Suess, G. G., Tyler, W. J. and Brungardt, V. H. 1969. Influence of weight and nutrition upon muscle growth and intramuscular fat deposition in Holstein steers. J. Anim. Sci. 29: 410–416 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed