Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T01:38:46.602Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Production aspects of integrated housing of sows with confined litters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2017

Ing. Wim Houwers
Affiliation:
Institute of Agricultural Engineering (IMAG-DLO), P.O. Box 43, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands
ir. Rob Buré
Affiliation:
Institute of Agricultural Engineering (IMAG-DLO), P.O. Box 43, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands
Johan Walvoort
Affiliation:
Institute of Agricultural Engineering (IMAG-DLO), P.O. Box 43, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands
Get access

Extract

In an integrated group housing system for sows, animals of all stages of production are kept in one group, except around farrowing, and remain there throughout their productive life. Lactating sows have access to the suckling section of the house via an electronic gate. Jostling of piglets from different litters is avoided by keeping the litters in their own suckling pen until weaning. The system allows lactating sows to freely evade their piglets, and move between the suckling section and the communal area. They can maintain their social position and cool off in the relative cool communal area. Earlier observations (Houwers et al., 1992) showed sows decreased sucklings and increased their absence from the farrowing pen towards weaning. It was not clear whether the overall performance of the piglets was depressed by absence of sows before weaning. The relevance for practical farming partly depends on the production results that can be achieved.

Type
Joint WPSA/BSAP Sessions
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Production 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anonymous, 1992. Resultaten CBK-Bedrijfsvergelijking. Siva-producten b.a., Wageningen; 1 p.Google Scholar
Houwers, H.W.J., Buré, R.G. & Koomans, P., 1992. Behaviour of sows in a free-access farrowing section. Farm Building Progress 109: 9–11.Google Scholar
Kirkwood, R.N., Smith, W.C. & Lapwood, K.R., 1983. Effect of partial weaning of piglets on lactational oestrus and sow and piglet body weight changes. N.Z.J, of Experimental Agriculture. 11: 231–233. Google Scholar
Lokhorst, C. & Dijkman, A.J., 1992 Vergelijking tussen een voedingsmodel en een voedingsschema voor zeugen. IMAG-DLO Nota P 92–55, 29 pp.Google Scholar