Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-27T02:29:39.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Where have the Rights of Forensic Patients Gone?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Maya Sabatello
Maya Sabatello*
Affiliation:
Division of Law, Ethics, and Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University. Email comments to: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the Treatment of Institutionalized Forensic Patients
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 109 , 2015 , pp. 77 - 80
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, G.A. Res. 61/106, U.N. Doc. A/RES/61/106, art. 1 (Dec. 13, 2006) [hereinafter: CRPD].

2 Gerard Quinn & Theresia Degener, Human Rights and Disability, UN HR/PUB/02/1 (2002), available at http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/HRDisabilityen.pdf; O’Cinneide, Colm, Extracting Protection for the Rights of Persons with Disabilities from Human Rights Frameworks: Established Limits and New Possibilities, 163, in The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: European and Scandinavian Perspectives (Arnardoóttir, O.M. & Quinn, G., eds., 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 See, e.g., “Accessibility” and “Reasonable Accommodation” (Articles 9 and 2 of the CRPD, respectively).

4 CPRD, supra note 1, art. 1.

5 See, e.g., CPRD, supra note 1, arts. 3, 4, 8.

6 The following discussion is based on the CRPD’s negotiations archive, Ad Hoc Committee on a Comprehensive and Integral International Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Rights and Dignity of Persons with Disabilities, available at http://www.un.org/disabilities/default.asp?id=1423

7 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, G.A. Res. 2200A (XXI), 52, U.N. Doc. A/6316, art. 9 (1966).

8 Working Group, Daily Summary Related to Draft Article 10 — Liberty and Security of the Person (Jan. 14, 2004), available at http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/enable/rights/wgsuma10.htm.

9 NHRI Response to the Questions Proposed by the Chair on Monitoring, seventh session of the Ad-Hoc Committee (Jan. 31, 2006), available at http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/enable/rights/ahc7nhri.htm.

10 This understanding was expressed by a few states representatives and the Chair of the Ad Hoc Committee, and may also be understood from the statement of the WNUSP above.

11 Hickey, Huhana, Indigenous People with Disabilities – The Missing Link, 229, in Human Rights and Disability Advocacy (Sabatello, M. & Schulze, M. eds., 2014)Google Scholar.

12 Sabatello, Maya, Disability, Human Rights and Global Health, 244, in 16 Law and Global Health: Current Legal Issues (Freeman, M. et al. eds., 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13 See, e.g., Wetstein-Kroft, Susan & Vargo, James, Children’s Attitudes Towards Disability: A Review and Analysis of the Literature, 7 Int’l J. Advancement Counselling 181 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Parens, Erik & Asch, Adrienne, The Disability Rights Critique of Prenatal Genetic Testing, 29 Hastings Ctr. Rep. (Special Supplement) S1–S22 (1999)Google ScholarPubMed.

14 Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, General Comment 1 – Article 12: Equal Recognition Before the Law, CRPD/C/GC/1 (Apr. 11 2014), available at http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=CRPD/C/GC/1&Lang=en.