Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T02:54:59.102Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Treaties—A Cinderella Story

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Duncan B. Hollis
Duncan B. Hollis*
Affiliation:
Temple University Beasley School of Law
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
The Shifting Sands of Treaty Interpretation
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 102 , 2008 , pp. 412 - 416
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 128 S.Ct. 1346, 1357 (2008).

2 Id. at 1356 (citing Foster v. Neilson, 27 U.S. (2 Pet.) 253, 315 (1829)).

3 See, e.g., Frolova v. Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, 761 F.2d 370, 373 (7th Cir. 1985); People of Saipan v. U.S. Dep’t of Interior, 502 F.2d 90, 97 (9th Cir. 1974).

4 See Medellin, 126 S.Ct. at 1364, 1366. The Court also utilized negotiating history as well as post-ratification understandings of other nations.

5 Id. at 1356 (quoting Igarta-De La Rosa v. United States, 417 F.3d 145, 150 (1st Cir. 2005)).

6 Sanchez-Llamas v. Oregon, 126 S.Ct. 2669, 2672 (2006) (quoting Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137, 177 (1803)).

7 Murray v. The Charming Betsy, 6 U.S. (2 Cranch) 64, 118 (1804).

8 Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, 548 U.S. 557 (2006).