No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 February 2017
1 See, e.g. X & Y v. Argentina, Report 38/96 in Annual Report of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights 1996, OEA/Ser.L/V/II.95, Doc.7 rev. at 50, 75 (1997).
2 Id.
3 Velásquez Rodríguez case (compensatory damages), 7 Inter-Am.Ct.H.R. (ser.C) (1989), para. 44.
4 Loayza Tamayo v. Peru, ___Inter-Am.Ct.H.R. (ser.C) (27 Sept. 1997).
5 Neira Alegria et al. case, Reparations, 23 Inter-Am.Ct.H.R. (ser.C) (1996) at para. 69.
6 Aloeboetoe et al. Case, 11 Inter-Am.Ct.H.R. (Ser.C) (1994).
7 Gangaram Panday case, 16 Inter-Am.Ct.H.R. (ser.C) (1994).
8 Statement of staff attorney for the court to the author.
9 Lawless v. Ireland, 1 Eur.Ct.H.R. (ser.B) (1961) at 261-62.
10 Matter of Viviana Gallardo, Decision of November 13, 1981, Inter-Am.Ct.H.R. No. G 101/81 at para. 22, reprinted in 20 I.L.M. 1424, 1428 (1981).
11 Pasqualucci, Jo, The Inter-American Human Rights System: Establishing Precedents and Procedure in Human Rights Law, 26 Inter-Am. L. Rev. 297, 320 (1994-95)Google Scholar.