Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T14:45:36.433Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Remarks by Frederic L. Kirgis, Jr

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Frederic L. Kirgis Jr.
Frederic L. Kirgis Jr.*
Affiliation:
University of California School of Law, Los Angeles
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Orderly Marketing Arrangements
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 72 , 1978 , pp. 1 - 8
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 S. Rep. No. 93-1298, 93d Cong. 2d Sess. 119 (1974).

2 Trade Act of 1974, §§ 201-203, 19 U.S.C. §§ 2251-53 (1976).

3 Agricultural Act of 1956, § 204, 7 U.S.C. § 1854 (1976).

4 See Jackson, The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade in United States Domestic Law, 66 MICH. L. REV. 249,281-85 (1967). All of GATT except Part IV has been proclaimed.

5 See United States v. Guy W. Capps, Inc., 204 F.2d 655 (4th Cir. 1953), aff'd on other grounds, 348 U.S. 296 (1955).

6 United States v. Yoshida Int'l. Inc., 526 F.2d 560, 572 (C.C.P.A. 1975) (emphasis in original).

7 FEA v. Algonquin SNG, Inc., 426 U.S. 548 (1976).

8 Sneaker Circus, Inc. v. Carter, 566 F.2d 396 (2d Cir. 1977); opinion on remand, F. Supp (E.D.N.Y. 1978).

9 28U.S.C. § 1582(1976).

10 Trade Act of 1974, § 203(b)(1), 19 U.S.C. § 2253(b)(1) (1976).

11 Id. § 203(c)(1), 19 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (1976).

12 U.S. CONST., art. I, § 7, cl. 2, 3.

13 Trade Act of 1974, § 203(d)(2), 19 U.S.C. § 2253(d)(2).

14 S. Rep. No. 93-1298, 93d Cong., 2d Sess. 126 (1974).

15 Cf. C. Tennant, Sons & Co. v. Dill, 158 F. Supp. 63 (S.D.N.Y. 1957), holding that a bilateral most-favored-nation clause essentially like that in GATT Art. I did not extend to quantitative restrictions.

16 See J. JACKSON, WORLD TRADE AND THE LAW OF GATT 823.3, at 559 (1969).

17 See, e.g., Presidential Proclamation 4445,41 Fed. Reg. 24101 at 24102 (1976) (specialty steels); GATT Doc. L/4525, at 3 (1977) (nonrubber footwear).

18 See Jackson, supra note 4.

19 See Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, arts. 46-64, U.N. Doc. A/CONF.39/27, 63 AJIL 875 (1969), 8 ILM 679 (1969).

20 See also id. arts. 30(4) & (5), 41(1).