No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Regulation of Investment Advisers: Are International Standards Necessary?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 February 2017
Abstract
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2124a/2124a21defb9b7ae18ae31afb660e3bc27d47517" alt="Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'"
- Type
- Topical Issues in International Securities
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 1995
References
1 See International Survey Of Investment Adviser Regulation (Marcia L. MacHarg & Roberta R. W. Kameda eds., 1994), which surveys the investment adviser regulatory systems in Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, the Republic of China (Taiwan), the European Union, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Italy, Japan, Korea, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, the United States and Venezuela.
2 U.S. Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended, 15 U.S. Code, Sections 80b-l-80b-21, as amended.
3 See Unibanco-Uniao de Bancos Brasileiros S.A. (July 28, 1992). See also The National Mutual Group (publicly available March 8,1993); Mercury Asset Management pic (publicly available April 16,1993); Kleinwort Benson Investment Management Limited et al. (publicly available December 15, 1993); and Murray Johnstone Holdings Limited et al. (publicly available October 7, 1994).