No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 December 2019
I will try to cover three different examples on issues in which the Inter-American and the European Courts have had different approaches, some substantive, some methodological, regarding the following issues:
1. A substantive and radical difference in the approach of the right to appeal a criminal conviction;
2. A substantive but slight difference in the approach of cases of involuntary or forced sterilization;
3. An example of evolution from divergence to convergence in the subject of access to information; and
4. A radical difference in the approach with respect to reparations.