Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-26T03:54:40.886Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Regime Complex for Plant Genetic Resources: An Overview

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

David G. Victor
David G. Victor*
Affiliation:
Program on Energy & Sustainable Development
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
The Global Conflict Over Genetic Resources
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 97 , 2003 , pp. 29 - 32
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See Kal Raustiala & David G. Victor, The Regime Complex for Plant Genetic Resources (2003), working paper # 14, available at <http://pesd.stanford.edu>.

2 International Convention for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants, Dec. 2, 1961, 34 UNTS 815, 45.

3 U.N.F.A.O. Res. 8/83, U.N.F.A.O., 22nd Session, Nov. 5-23,1983

4 U.N.F.A.O. Res. 3/2001, U.N.F.A.O., 31st Session, Nov. 2001.

5 Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, April 15, 1994, Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization, Annex 1C, Legal Instruments—Results of the Uruguay Round, vol. 31, 33 ILM 81 (1994).

6 See Demsetz, Harold, Toward a Theory of Property Rights, 57 Am. Econ. Rev. 347 (1967)Google Scholar; Gary D. Libecap, Contracting for Property Rights (1989).

7 See Demsetz, supra note 2, at 354.

8 See Levmore, Saul, Two Stories about the Evolution of Property Rights, 31 J. Legal Stud. 421, 422n.2 (2002)Google Scholar.

9 Id.; see also Libecap, supra note 2, at 2.

10 See Pisano, Gary P., Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, in Technological Innovation and Economic Performance 347, 366 (Steil, Benn et al. eds., 2002)Google Scholar.

11 For example, human rights treaties typically create a new set of specialized institutions to review implementation and sometimes to hear cases; similarly, every major international environmental negotiation since the Montreal Protocol in 1987 has created new international institutions.

12 See Slaughter, Anne-Marie, The Real New World Order, 76 Foreign Aff. 183 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13 See Goldstein, Judith L. et al., Introduction: Legalization and World Politics, 54 Int’l Org. 385 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14 See Ingram, Helen, Policy Implementation Through Bargaining: The Case of Federal Grants-in-Aid, 25 Pub. Pol’y 499 (1977)Google Scholar; see also Bardach & A. Kagan, Going by the Book: The Problem of Regulatory Unreasonableness (1982); Stewart, Richard B., The Reformation of American Administrative Law, 88 Harv. L. Rev. 1669 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15 See Keohane, Robert O. & Nye, Joseph S. Jr., The Club Model of Multilateral Cooperation and Problems of Democratic Legitimacy, in Efficiency, Equity and Legitimacy: the Multilateral Trading System at the Millennium 264 (Porter, Roger B. et al. eds., 2001)Google Scholar.