Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-qdpjg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-22T08:26:37.871Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Overlegalizing Silences: Human Rights and Nonstate Actors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Robert McCorquodale
Robert McCorquodale*
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham, United Kingdom
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Overlegalizing Human Rights
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 96 , 2002 , pp. 384 - 388
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 E.g., Ergi v. Turkey, 1998-IV Eur. Ct. H.R. 1751; Timurtas v. Turkey, App. 23531/94, (Eur. Ct. H.R. June 13, 2000), available at <http://www.ehcr.coe.int/eng.>.

2 A v. UK, 27 Eur. H.R. Rep. 611 (1999).

3 Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights, General Comment 4 on the Right to Housing, especially para 19.

4 Human Rights Committee General Comment 20 on the Prohibition against Torture and other Cruel, Inhumane or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, at para. 2.

5 McCorquodale, R. & Forgia, R. La, Taking off the Blindfolds: Torture and Non-State Actors, 1 Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 169 (2001)Google Scholar.

6 Sadiq Shek Elmi v. Australia, 7 Int’l H.R. Rep. 603, para. 6.5 (2000).

7 Otto, Dianne, Rethinking Universab: Opening Transformative Possibilities in International Human Rights Law, 18 Aust’l Y.B. Int’l L. 1 (1997)Google Scholar.

8 Philip Allott, Eunomia 288 (1990).

9 McCann v. United Kingdom, 21 Eur. H.R. Rep. 97 (particularly para. 213) (1995).