Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T08:00:12.230Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is ISDS Beneficial or Dangerous for the Rule of Law Both in the International and the National Spheres?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Ursula Kriebaum
Ursula Kriebaum*
Affiliation:
University of Vienna
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Does TTIP Need Investor-State Dispute Settlement?
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 109 , 2015 , pp. 203 - 207
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Tienhaara, K., Regulatory Chill and the Threat of Arbitration: A View from Political Science611, in Evolution in Investment Treaty Law and Arbitration (Brown, Chester & Miles, Kate eds., 2011)Google Scholar.

2 Caddel, Jeremy and Jensen, Nathan M., Which Host Country Government Actors Are Most Involved in Disputes with Foreign Investors?, Columbia FDI Perspectives: Perspectives on Topical Foreign Direct Investment Issues by the Vale Columbia Center on Sustainable International Investment, No. 120, 2 (Apr. 28, 2014)Google Scholar.