Article contents
Introduction: The Path to Sosa
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 February 2017
Abstract
- Type
- Customary International Law as Federal Law After Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 2007
References
1 542 U.S. 692 (2004).
2 28 U.S.C. sec. 1350.
3 ITT v. Vencap, Ltd., 519 F.2d 1001, 1015 (2d Cir. 1975).
4 630 F.2d 876 (2d Cir. 1980).
5 Kadic v. Karadzic, 70 F.3d 232 (2d Cir. 1995).
6 Doe v. Unocal Corp., 395 F.3d 978 (9th Cir. 2003).
7 Tel-Oren v. Libyan Arab Republic, 726 F.2d 774, 798 (D.C. Cir. 1984) (Bork, J., concurring).
8 United States v. Alvarez-Machain, 504 U.S. 655 (1992).
9 Sosa, 524 U.S. at 724.
10 Id. at 725.
11 Id.
12 See, e.g., Bradley, Curtis A. & Goldsmith, Jack N. The Current Illegitimacy of Human Rights Litigation, 66 Fordham L. Rev. 319 (1997)Google Scholar (arguing that modern international human rights litigation is unauthorized).
13 Sosa, 542 U.S. at 725-28.
14 Id. at 738.
15 376 U.S. 398 (1964).
16 Id. at 729, n.18.
17 See id. at 732-33.
- 1
- Cited by