Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-b4m5d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-21T16:29:12.879Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

International Criminal Law and Legal Ethics: The Need for Shared Expectations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Laurel Baig
Laurel Baig*
Affiliation:
Office of the Prosecutor for the ICTY
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Challenges of Transnational Legal Practice: Advocacy and Ethics
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 103 , 2009 , pp. 256 - 259
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2 See, e.g.. Prosecutor v. Limaj, Bala and Musliu, Case No. IT-03-66-T ICTY, Decision on Defence Motion on Prosecution Practice of ‘Proofing’ Witnesses (Dec. 10, 2004); Prosecutor v. Gacumbitsi, Case No. ICTR-2001-64-A, Judgement, 174 (July 7, 2006).

3 Prosecutor v. Lubanga Dyilo, Case No. ICC-01/04-01/06, Decision on the Practices of Witness Familiarisation and Witness Proofing, Pre-Trial Chamber I (Nov. 8, 2006).

4 Prosecutor v. Lubanga Dyilo, Case No. ICC-01/04-01/06, Decision Regarding the Practices Used to Prepare and Familiarise Witnesses for Giving Testimony at Trial, Trial Chamber I (Nov. 30, 2007).

5 Prosecutor v. Lubanga Dyilo, Decision Regarding the Practices Used to Prepare and Familiarise Witnesses for Giving Testimony at Trial, Case No. ICC-01/04-01/06, Trial Chamber 1, ¶ 51 (Nov, 30, 2007).

6 See, e.g., Prosecutor v. Milutinovic et al., Case No. IT-05-87-T ICTY, Decision on Odjanić Motion to Prohibil Witness Proofing (Dec. 12, 2006); Prosecutor v. Karemera, Ngirumpatse and Nzirorera, Case No. ICTR-98-44 AR73.8, Decision on Interlocutory Appeal Regarding witness Proofing (May 11, 2007).

7 See, e.g., ICC Code of Prof’L Conduct for [Defence] Counsel (Dec.2005); Code of Prof’L Conduct for Defence Counsel, Annexed to the Decision of the Registrar (June 8, 1998); ICTY, Code of Prof’L Conduct for Counsel Appearing Before the Int’l Tribunal, ICTY Doc. IT/125/Rev. 2 (June 29, 2006).

8 ICTY and ICTR Prosecutor’s Regulation No. 2, Standards of Prof’l Conduct for Prosecution Counsel (1999).