Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-b4m5d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-17T12:33:01.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interliberal Law: Comment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Jose E. Alvarez
Jose E. Alvarez*
Affiliation:
Columbia University School of Law, New York, NY
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Meeting Report
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 94 , 2000 , pp. 249 - 253
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 E.g., Slaughter, Anne-Marie, Government Networks: The Heart of the Liberal Democratic Order, in Democratic Governance and International Law 199 (Fox, Gregory H. & Roth, Brad R. eds., 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 See, e.g., Slaughter, Anne-Marie, International Law in a World of Liberal States, 6 EJIL 503 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 See, e.g., Slaughter, Anne-Marie, Law Among Liberal States: Liberal Internationalism and the Act of State Doctrine, 92 Colum. L. Rev. 1907 (1992)Google Scholar.

4 See Brad R. Roth, Evaluating Democratic Progress, at 493 and Susan Marks, International Law, Democracy, and the End of History, at 532, in Democratic Governance and International Law, supra note 1 ; see also Koh, Harold H., Why Do Nations Obey International Law? 106 Yale L. J. 2599, 2650 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Public Committee Against Torture in Israel v. Israel H.C. 5100/94 (1994).

6 See, e.g., Benvenisti, Eyal, Judicial Misgivings Regarding the Application of International Law: An Analysis of Attitudes of National Courts, 4 EJIL 159 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 See, e.g., Slaughter, Anne-Marie, Typology of Transjudicial Communication, 29 U. Rich. L. Rev. 99 (1995)Google Scholar.

8 Margaret E. Keck & Kathryn Sikkink, Activists Beyond Borders 12, 201-02 (1998).

9 See, e.g., Implementing the Uruguay Round (John H. Jackson & Alan Sykes, ed. 1997).

10 See Edith B. Weiss & Harold K. Jacobson, Engaging Countries (1998).

11 Mansfield, Edward D. and Snyder, Jack, Democratization and the Danger of War, in Debating the Democratic Peace 301 (Brown, Michael E. et al. eds., 1997)Google Scholar.