Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-wpx69 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-07T05:19:41.618Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Global Litigation, Local Judgment Enforcement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Cassandra Burke Robertson
Cassandra Burke Robertson*
Affiliation:
Case Western Reserve University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
State Law Litigation of International Norms
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 108 , 2014 , pp. 439 - 442
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Harrison, John, The Constitutional Origins and Implications of Judicial Review, 84 Va. L. Rev. 333, 344 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar (“While the negative norm does the work of restriction, the positive norms contain most of the information.”).

2 Brown v. Board of Educ., 347 U.S. 483 (1954).

3 Yeazell, Stephen C., Brown, the Civil Rights Movement, and the Silent Litigation Revolution , 57 Vand. L. Rev. 1975, 1976 (2004).Google Scholar

4 Robertson, Cassandra Burke, Due Process in the American Identity, 64 Ala. L. Rev. 255 (2012)Google Scholar.

5 Filártiga v. Peña-Irala, 630 F.2d 876 (2d Cir. 1980).

6 Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007).

7 Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009).

8 Miller, Arthur R., Are the Federal Courthouse Doors Closing? What’s Happened to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure?, 43 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 587, 599 (2011)Google Scholar.

9 Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes, 131 S. Ct. 2541 (2011).

10 Morrison v. Nat’l Australia Bank Ltd., 561 U.S. 247 (2010).

11 Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., 133 S. Ct. 1659, 1669 (2013).

12 Hoffman, Paul & Stephens, Beth, International Human Rights Cases Under State Law and in State Courts, 3 U.C. Irvine L. Rev. 9 (2013)Google Scholar; Christopher A. Whytock, Donald Earl Childress III & Ramsey, Michael D., Foreword: After Kiobel—International Human Rights Litigation in State Courts and Under State Law , 3 U.C. Irvine L. Rev. 1 (2013)Google Scholar.

13 Ernest A. Young, Universal Jurisdiction, the Alien Tort Statute, and Transnational Public Law Litigation After Kiobel (Mar. 14, 2014), available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2409838.

14 Daimler AG v. Bauman, 134 S. Ct. 746 (2014); see also “Rocky” Rhodes, Charles W. & Robertson, Cassandra Burke, Toward a New Equilibrium in Personal Jurisdiction, 48 UC Davis L. Rev. 207, 216-22 (2014)Google Scholar.

15 Meeran, Richard, Tort Litigation Against Multinational Corporations for Violation of Human Rights: An Overview of the Position Outside the United States, 3 City U. H.K. L. Rev. 1, 26, 34, 39, 41 (2011)Google Scholar.

16 Terry, John & Shody, Sarah, Could Canada Become a New Forum for Cases Involving Human Rights Violations Committed Abroad?, 1(4) Com. Litig. & Arb. Rev. 63, 64 (2012)Google Scholar, available at http://www.torys.com/Publications/Publications/AR2012-36.pdf.

17 Sekularac, Ivana & Deutsch, Anthony, Dutch Court Says Shell Responsible for Nigeria Spills, Reuters (Jan. 30, 2013)Google Scholar, at http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/01/30/us-shell-nigeria-lawsuit-idUSBRE90S16X20130130.

18 Whytock, Christopher A. & Robertson, Cassandra Burke, Forum Non Conveniens and the Enforcement of Foreign Judgments, 111 Colum. L. Rev. 1444, 1462 (2011)Google Scholar.

19 Carodine, Montré D., Political Judging: When Due Process Goes International, 48 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1159 (2007)Google Scholar.

20 Chevron Corp. v. Naranjo, 667 F.3d 232, 246 (2d Cir. 2012).