Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-7jkgd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-22T07:04:19.054Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Foreign Relations Law and the Roberts Court: An Appellate Practitioner’s Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Melissa Arbus Sherry
Melissa Arbus Sherry*
Affiliation:
Office of Latham & Watkins LLP
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Foreign Relations Law in the Roberts Court: The First Decade
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 109 , 2015 , pp. 39 - 42
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum, 133 S. Ct. 1659 (2013).

2 Zivotofsky ex rel. Zivotofsky v. Clinton, 132 S. Ct. 1421 (2012).

3 Bond v. United States, 131 S. Ct. 2355 (2011).

4 Bond v. United States, 134 S. Ct. 2077 (2014).

5 Yates v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 1074 (2015).

6 Halliburton Co. v. Erica P. John Fund, Inc., 134 S. Ct. 2398 (2014).

7 Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd., 561 U.S. 247 (2010).