Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T01:52:06.612Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Arbitrating Human Rights

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Roger P. Alford*
Affiliation:
Pepperdine University School of Law

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Immunity and Accountability: Is The Balance Shifting?
Copyright
© 2005 The American Society of International Law

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 630 F.2d 876 (2d Cir. 1980).

2 488 U.S. 428 (1989).

3 The U.S. Supreme Court cited Filitariga with apparent approval in Sosa, 124 S.Ct. at 2764, but that was regarding the scope of the law of nations, not the scope of foreign officials'immunity.

4 28 U.S.C. § 1605(a)(6).

5 For a recent discussion, see In re Agent Orange Product Liability Litigation, 2005 WL 729177, (E.D.N.Y.2005). For references on the topic, see Ronen Shamir, Between Self-Regulation and the Alien Tort Claims Act: On the Contested Concept of Corporate Social Responsibility, 38 Law & Socy Rev. 635, 661-663 (2004).

7 See Kirgis, Paul F. Apportioning Tort Damages in New York: A Method to the Madness, 75 St. John's L. Rev. 427 (2001) (discussing New York rule); Tony Weir, All or Nothing?, 78 Tul. L. Rev. 511 (2004) (discussing English Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978).Google Scholar

11 See

12 See Eliasoph, Ian H. A Missing Link: International Arbitration and the Ability of Private Actors to Enforce Human Rights Norms, Google Scholar