Article contents
Amnesty, Amnesia and Remembrance: International Obligations and the Need to Prevent the Repetition of Gross Violations of Human Rights
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 February 2017
Abstract
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/19635/19635d0733ac9812f8cc7ab7df1532835b34d2eb" alt="Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'"
- Type
- Transitional Justice: Amnesties, Truth Commissions and Beyond
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 1998
References
1 Dugard, John, Is the Truth and Reconciliation Process Compatible with International Law? An Unanswered Question, 13 S. Afr. J. Hum. Rts. 258, 263 (1997)Google Scholar.
2 Orentlicher, Diane, Settling Accounts: The Duty to Prosecute Human Rights Violations of a Prior Regime, 100 Yale L. J. 2537 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
3 Dr. Niel Barnard, former head of the National Intelligence Service, before a special hearing of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission on the role of the former State Security Council (the highest decision-making body in the apartheid security apparatus which functioned as a subcommittee of the Cabinet) on December 4, 1997.
4 See AZAPO v. Truth and Reconciliation Commission, 1996 (4) SALR 562 (Judgment of the Supreme Court of South Africa, Cape of Good Hope Provincial Division).
5 Section 3(l)(b) of the Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation Act 34 of 1995.
- 2
- Cited by