Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T09:35:31.783Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Agent Orange Case: Vietnam Ass’n for Victims of Agent Orange/Dioxin v. Dow Chemical Co

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Anthea Roberts*
Affiliation:
Debevoise & Plimpton LLP

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Protagonist Or Pawn? The Private Contractor In Foreign Affairs
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Vietnam Ass’n for Victims of Agent Orange/Dioxin v. Dow Chemical Co., 2005 WL 729177 (E.D.N.Y. March 28, 2005).

2 In Re “Agent Orange” Product Liability Litigation, 597 F.Supp. 740 (E.D.N.Y. 1984).

3 2005 WL 729177.

4 Filartiga v. Pena-Irala, 630 F.2d 876 (2d Cir.1980).

5 Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain, 124 S.Ct. 2739 (2004).

6 Id., at n. 20.

7 See Zyklon B Case (Trial of Bruco Tesch and Two Others), 1-5 Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals 92-102.