Hostname: page-component-669899f699-2mbcq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-24T13:31:41.598Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Skeptic Speaks: I Am Not a Bund, Pig-Stupid Opponent of Unification

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Paul B. Stephan
Paul B. Stephan*
Affiliation:
University of Virginia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Why (Not) Seek Uniform Solutions?
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 96 , 2002 , pp. 336 - 338
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1 Schwartz, Alan & Scott, Robert E., The Political Economy of Private Legislatures, 143 U. Pa. L. Rev. 595 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules Relating to International Transportation by Air, Oct. 12, 1929, 49 Stat. 3000, 137 L.N.T.S. 11.

3 International Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules of Law Relating to Bills of Lading, Aug. 25, 1924, 120 L.T.S. 155; Protocol to Amend the 1924 Convention, Feb. 23, 1968, 1412 UNTS 127; United Nations Convention on the Carriage of Goods by Sea, Mar. 31, 1978, 1695 UNTS 3.

4 ICC Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits, ICC Pub. No. 500 (1993).

5 Michaels, Ralf, Three Paradigms of Legal Unification: National, International, Transnational, 96 ASIL Proc. 332-33 (2002)Google Scholar.

6 Tiebout, Charles M., A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures, 64 J. Pol. Econ. 416 (1956)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 Id. at 422-24.