Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-27T02:08:16.075Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Security Council Resolution 1530, Evidence and the United Nations Security Council

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Thérèse O’Donnell
Thérèse O’Donnell*
Affiliation:
University of Strathclyde
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
The Laws of Force and the Turn to Evidence
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 100 , 2006 , pp. 47 - 51
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 At <http://www.oxfordgovemance.org/fileadmin/Publications/Ga002.pdf>.

2 UN SCOR 58th Sess., 4701st Mtg, UN Doc S/PV. 4701 (2003).

3 At <http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/10/20021007-8.html>.

4 E/CN.4/2004/56/Add.2.

5 UN Doc. S/2001/1246 lB(b)(l) (Dec. 21, 2001).

6 Wellens, Karl, The U.N. Security Council and New Threats to the Peace: Back to the Future, 8 J. Conf. & Sec. L. 15, 31 (2003)Google Scholar.

7 Lowe, Vaughan, ‘Clear and Present Danger’: Responses to Terrorism, 54 Int’L & Comp. L.Q. 185 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 UN Doc. S/2004/186 (Mar. 11, 2004).

9 UN SCOR 58th Sess., 4792nd Mtg, UN Doc S/PV. 4792 (2003).

10 See Koskenniemi, Martti, Comments, in United States Hegemony and the Foundations of International Law 95 (Byers, M. & Nolte, G. eds., 2003)Google Scholar.

10 Thalif Deen, UN Loses Face over Hurried Vote on Spain Bombing, Inter Press Service, Mar. 16, 2004, available at <http://www.globalpolicy.org>.

12 See O’Connell, Mary Ellen, Evidence of Terror, 7 J. Conf. & Sec. L. 19 (2002)Google Scholar for a discussion of the various standards.

13 Lobel, Jules, The Use of Force to Respond to Terrorist Attacks: The Bombing of Sudan and Afghanistan, 24 Yale J. Int’l L. 537, 547 (1999)Google Scholar.

14 UN Doc. S/2001/946 (Oct. 7, 2001).

15 Murphy, Sean, Terrorism and the Concept of “Armed Attack” in Article 51 of the U.N. Charter, 43 Harv. Int’l L.J. 41, 48 (2002)Google Scholar.

16 Schneideman, Sara N. Standards of Proof in Forcible Responses to Terrorism, 50 Syracuse L. Rev. 249, 255 (2000)Google Scholar.

17 Elaine Sciolino, Many in Europe Suspect Spain Misled Them About Attackers, N.Y. Times, Mar. 16, 2004.

18 Koskenniemi, Martti, International Law in Europe: Between Tradition and Renewal, 16 Eur. J. Int’l L. 113, 121 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

19 Matthias Herdegen, Comments, in Byers & Nolte, supra note 10, at 187.

20 Case Concerning Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo, Judgment (Dem. Rep. Congo v. Uganda) (Int’l Ct. Justice Dec. 19, 2005), para. 61.

21 Ratner, Steven R. The Security Council and International Law, in The UN Security Council: From the Cold War to the 21St Century 602 (Malone, David M. ed., 2004)Google Scholar.